Search results

Welcome one and all. Once again I wish to ask for the wisdom of the people of EN World. Warning: This is nitpicking and over thinking an imaginary creature. Oh and this is in D&D 3.5. This thread will be a bit long, the primary subject is the "Living Construct". There is probably other...

All charisma skills? (UMD, Intimidate, Handle Animal...ect too?) Cha mod to will save (force of personality [feat]), if you did not know this already. No offense but you just packed the Sorc with bonus feats that anyone can take, great choices imo, it just does not make the sorc unique...

As a house rule in our campaigns the Sorc gets Eschew materials at first level, in addition to the familiar. Makes sense imo.

Well it would be an interesting addition to the Barbs abilities. Could be abused by multi-classing with a caster, so then don't really need to cast defensively. Might be a good idea to add this ability at higher barb level maybe at level 5, and name it Barbarian Rush or something (still the...

Here are my 2 cooper pieces: - Druid progression animal companion -Bonus Feats instead of combat styles, or make up different combat styles (something involving trowing, maybe some spear mastery with pole-arms). - Something unique instead of Endurance. - Try some of the variants out there.

The Dire Menagerie [Creatures] - Giant in the Playground Forums It's not official, but its something.

The Yugoloths would take advantage of the situation. Or just a change of management in Hell and the Abyss, so the runners up would probably take charge.

I think that is the cause of a low Wisdom and probable High INT...or just some personal background issue.

Here is an interesting example of a hight INT character: Goblins Archive 02/21/2009 - but you might have read this comic anyway.

I didn't want to quote the whole thing. This is a good example of what would be interesting to do, I might implement something of a sort. Might not even cost him his Paladin-hood probably just a stern warning, but sure will annoy the person a bit. And thanks for reminding me its not just...

Well they never got beyond high school (as in 12 years of schooling in total)...on the other hand I am finishing my BSc this year...and there older then me by 1-2 years.

Please don't go off topic, I just wished to point out that removing alignment would solve multiple problems including the use of poisons without damaging the role-playing. (FYI Good and Evil are the same thing just viewed from a different societies point).

Heh interesting. Oh and the thread isn't just about me annoying paladins..its about the community of EN World and how would they annoy them. :) I will add some ideas after my exam tomorrow.

You should read my previous post, the only you quoted the bolded part from...i think i make my point there that poison should not be alignment based.

OH, like that, well it is worth a shot i guess. XD

And yet so right. :)

Oh that "I'm not touching you". And how does this translate into D&D? Ask a bystander and hold a knife to there throat and say "I am not killing him"? :P

Fair? So we are down 4 alignments that can use it now? (any non-good-lawful). Lawful characters might use poisons too. And what if you use the poison to weaken/stop a determined opponent who you don't actually want to hurt, or save him from hurting him self in the process. How is using subdued...

Yes I actually planned that from the start... but well read below. Well the first character that I was planning was a Kobold Paladin (with the explanation of "its not as bad of an idea as a LG Bugbear/monk" :P). But the prospect of playing a creation of previous epic level character was much...

Could i get an example for this? Cause it don't think I understand it fully.