Search results

  1. pawsplay

    2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads

    In the D&D I cut my teeth on, fairies and pixies were considered humanoid and susceptible to charm person.
  2. pawsplay

    2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads

    At some point, D&D gave us the hamadryad, a dryad who isn't bound to a particular tree to survive. That's reverse, and I am far more keen to see that reversed than I am concerned about what genders a dryad might have. I don't particularly like the idea of male hags, because I don't have a...
  3. pawsplay

    2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads

    I'm not setting out how "big of a deal" it is. As I said, gnolls don't really closely map to a specific example or trope or representation of a real human group. However, they do overlap considerably with "savage" tropes, and they are factually situated in Africa. There is simply no way of...
  4. pawsplay

    2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads

    It is weird that hyenas are distinctly African, and gnolls are saddled with tropes about savage people, the worship of Chaotic entities, and other Lovecraftian stuff about non-Europeans. It's not 1:1 but the tropes are there.
  5. pawsplay

    [possibly controversial]What is wrong with Vampire the Masquerade 5E?

    Things I don't like about 5e: It's complicated. Blood dice? The clan flaws can be severe and I'm not sure how some of these guys have survived a decade, much less a millennium. Even though some really patient people have tried to explain it to me, I don't understand the Ministry, and how they...
  6. pawsplay

    2025 Monster Manual to Introduce Male Versions of Hags, Medusas, and Dryads

    I would rather leave hags "broken" the way they have been, and try to fix the setting in other ways, than to just say there are male hags and call it a day. I also don't think it really fixes anything.
  7. pawsplay

    D&D 3.x Combining 3.0 and 3.5 - A Thread

    I personally think the handling of DR, weapon sizes, and monster building all went backwards for 3.5. DR became complicated and made characters carry around more weapons. Bilbo takes a -2 to attack with Sting. Dinosaurs with 12 HD now suddenly have a bunch of feats and need to spend some skill...
  8. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) Goblins and Orcs Not Being Green

    Early on, when it was specified at all, orcs were brown or green, and almost certainly looked very similar to the orcs drawn by the Brothers Hildebrandt for LOTR book covers. In my youth, I was informed that goblins were yellow or ochre. A lot of things were ochre back then. Kobolds were...
  9. pawsplay

    D&D General Drow as in Cow or Drow as in Snow: Where did the Dark Elves Come From?

    My pronunciation is a lot closer to "draw," but in an American way, without a phantom R, but also not a Texan way with a flat vowel. Or I could say it rhymes with Nassau, the city, not the place in New York. I could say the vowel sound is the same as in bout, but then I would have to tell you...
  10. pawsplay

    D&D General The Case For High INT Fighters in Dungeons and Dragons

    "Intelligence" in the sense of a D&D stat that relates to skills, knowledge, and mental clarity doesn't really correspond with the idea of intelligence as a general, everyday construct. A lot of intelligence, in the real world sense, would include WIS as well as INT. While there could be a high...
  11. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) You're not planning on getting 2024 D&D? Why is that?

    The word I would use to describe my distaste of many of the changes is "overprocessed." Thematic things are too consistent. Mechanics based on play are focused on play-itself rather than the core pillars of combat, exploration, and intrigue. There's too much, "oh this is for XYZ players" and not...
  12. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) So IS it a new edition?

    It's not really the Ship of Theseus. If anything it's the Sorites Paradox. But my point was that "edition" has a commonly accepted meaning in the book trade, and a related meaning in the board game trade. The RPG industry largely ignores both definitions and tries to make it mean something like...
  13. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) So IS it a new edition?

    You can't play your current character in the old version.
  14. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) So IS it a new edition?

    Every one of those patches is a different "version," it will tell what version number right on the screen.
  15. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) So IS it a new edition?

    That's an interesting linguistic shift. In fact, we were not talking about new games, but new editions of the same game. The video games I play will tell you what edition they are to the third decimal point.
  16. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) So IS it a new edition?

    Only in RPGs could you change the rules and then claim it's not a new edition.
  17. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2024) 2024 Player's Handbook reveal: "New Ranger"

    I just keep coming back to these videos with the same complaint: yes, each class should have a distinctive feel, but the most important thing is that each class be playable. I'd rather have three classes that are basically just the fighter, but work, then three classes which are distinct but...
  18. pawsplay

    D&D 5E (2014) Fighter should be called Knight and Monk Should be called Fighter, change my mind

    JRPGs agree with you. Various vintage RPGs agree with you (Dragon Warriors, for instance). Plenty of folklore agrees with you (Snow White and the seven knights). A lot of early 20th century sources prefer "boxer" for Chinese fighters, but fighter was also used. Whether or not they "should" be...
  19. pawsplay

    Any Supers Game that feels Super?

    There are limits on what you could spend. The upshot was that you could put characters up against each other with a pretty serious power gap, and it would still work, but the person with the lower stats would just leak HP so fast, it had the feeling of a serious threat.
Top