Search results

Huh. Weird. Works for me when I clicked on it. Takes me to post #168 (by my login's count). The one I came into this conversation with. Directly quoting you. The one you responded to but failed to address. If your browser is having trouble, just scroll up a bit. I'm sure you'll find it easily...

The way this new ignore function works still takes some getting used to. But I think I like it. [also notices subtle mimicking of my points...]

The only one I've expressed in this thread. You responded to it. You just failed to address it. Its not even a trick question or anything. I'm not sure how much clearer I could have made it. Maybe you could give it another go? This time responding to what I actually wrote, rather than what you...

Scared Cows? Poor little ladies! Anyway, when I'm DM I shy away from including vanilla plus items. I don't mind them having pluses, but they have to have more than just that.

Speaking of proving stuff, can you show me where I ever made that argument? Or even broached it? That has nothing to do with the point I've been making about your example. Maybe you could just send me that Ulysses S. Grant when you've fail to find it?...

I wouldn't take that bet. Even with imaginary dollars. The probability of someone around here saying something completely different from what they actually meant is way too high. And even still, my point is that an invisible statue is interacting with the environment. Which is contrary to the...

I offered up three quick examples of how the invisible statue might interact with the environment. Did you miss those? I'm still not sure why you aren't at least giving the PCs a chance to notice it. Not even a slim one...

Okay? Not sure what any of that has to do with my reply of Oofta saying, "The PCs had no way of knowing it was there because it was not interacting with the environment in any way that could be detected."

Are you saying there was no DC with which the PCs might have had a chance of realizing it was there? A breeze reflecting off the statue causing a swirl of air? A lip of a line of dust collected along its base? The faint echo of their footsteps bouncing off it? Zero chance of anyone ever sensing...

I come back from the weekend to find this thread has taken a very strange turn, even considering its history. I wish there was a "hard exit" option for threads. Maybe I should just type up a ragequit post here explaining how I'm never coming back...

Which is true of EB as well, of course....

This sounds like the argument: The Melee Warrior's problem is quite simple: "It's always better to be an Archer".

So no example, huh? That's a shame. I wished you'd bothered to mention your point was irrelevant to this thread, let alone forum.

I'm curious how you came to the conclusion at the end of your post here, given that you say you are playing a totem barbarian. Perhaps you simply left unspoken your experience playing a berserker with which to compare?

Not only that, but if the theory is that "Frenzy is completely outclassed by Polearm Master", then don't take PAM as a berserker. Its not like you lose that "feat slot" or anything. Use that ASI, you would have otherwise used to take it, and do something else with it. Its as if the theory is...

Well then, duh! You're splitting up your total posts among multiple accounts. Of course you'll save all the good, XP/laugh worthy posts for this handle! I can shenanigans on you, sir! Shenanigans I say!

Speaking of which, the only "assassin" (at least 3 rogue levels and taking that subclass) I've played in 5e thus far is a "one-man-one-ranger" style holy agent of his church. "Holy assassin" is a quick-and-dirty tag, I guess, sure. But not entirely accurate. He's not a killer for the church...

Who isn't? I might could still use a better breakdown of what you mean by "story first". Because its still a little vague to me. Sorry if I'm just being dense and not picking up what you've been saying. But, I mean, I could easily use that as an accurate descriptor for a chronically railroading DM.

Yeah. Guess I like to post a lot of non sequiturs. I also don't employ sockpuppets. Not saying you do. ;)