Search results

I think having a zillion classes is a mistake. Id prefer a subclass mechanic “swap your next talent roll for this”

Probably

Nah. No dooming flaw, just sacrifice.

"a satisfying sequence of events in which PCs (mine and others') act as big damn hero protagonists, putting their values to the test through challenges, leading to an eventual denouement wherein a on-for-now is reached“ Youve loaded satisfying , hero protagonists, testing values, and eventual...

I think that tjere is a point buried in Mearls’ cloud-shouting and grognard-knicker-flashing. The pearl in the mearls is I can see the fun in a rpg with no or low character mortality. Other stakes are available. I can see the fun in a complex crunchy rpg with a gazilluon combat relared...

Pre or post Ibsen Tragedy?

There is no one word to replace “story”, thats the issue. Use whatever you feel is right. And if you cant find a synonym or phrase to substitute, it means you were waffling in the first place.

“Story” needs to be retired as a term. Its useless.

There was an old lady that swallowed a fly….

dismay? Why? You gave the players a challenge (spot the trick) and they aced it !

Agency isnt binary, most things are neutral.

the error of thinking a mere first level spell can thwart a powerful antagonist?

Im coming to the conclusion that a significant slice of D&D players would be better off playing Rolemaster instead. Nb: this is not a criticism of either system or any particular playstyle.

“To hit Roll a d20, add your attack and beat opponents AC” “ and “Elves have +1 to bows” are different things and labelling them both “rules” and deviation as “fiat” is obfuscatory at best.

See, this is the silly darkness fetish.

you can only cheat in a contest

Im not smitten by the obsession with illumination. Its fine for crypts etc. but if dwarves, goblins, and orcs etc. can’t see in the dark then surely many sorts of dungeons will be quite well lit by the efforts of its denizens.

You are right. I am unable to grasp the special magic that transmutes a Decision into a Fiat. And because I am a clever and proud fellow, I conclude that this because these terms are inadequate for discussing some probable real concern about Gm authority and player agency.

What you call “no fiat” is still fiat.

You are wrong. You are hallucinating a difference that isnt there.