Search results

I couldn't tell you what they're doing to nail the Traveller vibe, but leaving proficiency bonus+feats+levels is scary enough to keep some folk with dnd5e-based systems. As long as there's some familiarity, there's the feeling that you can learn whatever else even if, realistically, there's just...

You don't have to learn new rules. That's a big deal to some people, particularly folk that joined ttrpgs with DnD5e and haven't played anything else. I have some of them at my tables 😅

That's a fair point, I think of 5e as high-powered because of the player characters' ability to punch well above their weight class... but while this uses 5e's engine, that doesn't mean it'll be "5e-compatible" where everything will be the same power level/backwards-compatible with 5e.

Wow, good find! Here's its Steam page, there's a demo on there. Release date... some time in 2026 :)

Having less magic in the setting always seemed to lead to certain classes enjoying a lot more power, because there're fewer common counters to them. If fewer folk know about magic, there's less reason for enemies to know the counters to said magic. I wonder what could be done about that 🤔

I get it, everyone wants a piece of the 5e pie. There are plenty of people that say "I already know how 5e works, why would I want to learn another ruleset when I can just play different stuff in 5e?"

Yeah, mods are super important to curating community.

Sure! You can play a game in a sword and sorcery setting where the players run a tavern. But I don't think it's harmful to define a genre, name inspirations for it, and suggest the kind of adventures that that genre lends itself to. Is that what you're responding to?

Wow, I did not know that! I just looked it up! Player options: Spells & Magic. I'm pretty sure I have that book, but never made the connection.

What would y'all call the aesthetic style that they're going for with artificer? I imagine if I said "steampunk" that would cause some fits, 'cuz it's not using steam n' such, but the brassy color in both provided images really lends itself towards that vibe in my mind.

Tales of the Valiant's Game Masters Guide gives definitions for a bunch under the Adventures & Campaigns section (I like that they took the time and page count to detail such).. but not those 😅 But man, the ToV GMG is so good!

AFAIK jackalope is the most powerful option pre-MoMe2, it was the go-to for one of my skinchanger players. As far as save proficiencies, yeah it's incredibly uncommon in the MM14 and MoMe in general. It was pointed out in another thread that they "stealth fixed" monster saves in MM24, I assume...

I thought that too, but would you want that for 5.5e? Would it fit? I guess it might include rules to fit it to S&S.

I didn't say to increase HP, I don't think? 😅 We can agree on the 2014 monster saves being super bad. What did they do to 2024 saves to make them better? Did they give most monsters save proficiencies? In designing 5e14 I get why they'd want monsters to fail saves- it sucks if your hold monster...

That's the problem I have with just adding numbers to everything, adding power to both sides of the board, rather than paring them back. You're just bloating stuff up- whether it's time per combat, time per turn, time just calculating BS, etc.

I don't know that I agree higher defenses is the answer, or rather the only answer. Mearls suggested a roughly 35% increase to damage and 35% decrease to HP for most if not all enemies, which makes things a lot more tense (I believe that's what he ended up doing for his home games). I've tried...

Yes. Either the PCs are too powerful, or the monsters aren't powerful enough. I'd rather pare back PC power than up monster power, 'cuz I'd rather have things a little more "grounded" and avoid even more math via more numbers and more dice, but I guess either way you're rewriting a book.. either...

It's very very very doable. 5e PCs punch waaay above their weight class.