Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Best Horror Movies of All Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 9486045"><p>There are definitely films that do CGI well. I don't want to sound like too much of a crank lol. I think part of it for me isn't even the CGI itself, because when CGI first emerged, I remember being impressed in many instances. It is it is often used in ways that, for me at least, makes the movie look less aesthetically pleasing (some films it almost looks like the CGI department is intentionally thwarting the director or cinematographer with a muddy or disjointed color palette). It is less about the quality of the CGI than the overall look (I've seen movies with not great CGI but the color scheme fits, and it bother some less----I watch a lot of Chinese movies and shows with varying degrees of quality in the CGI and for me they often do a better job of choosing their colors). The other big issue, which I think a lot of people who grew up on practical effects share, is often the CGI lacks a sense of weight. I think this isn't inherent to CGI. I've seen plenty of CGI that gets weight right. But we all know of movies where you are watching an action scene and it doesn't feel believable because the objects and people don't feel tethered by physical laws, and don't seem to be interacting with the environment around them. Also there is something to be said for a car chase that involves real cars. But I have seen plenty of CGI where these things haven't been issues, and it added to the movies. </p><p></p><p>The other thing about practical effects, and this might tie to your point about being older and having bias, is I know how to appreciate them just by being raised on them. I have a better sense of how they are done, and I know many of the special effects people by name, so I have of a grasp of the artistry behind it. I find this allows me to enjoy even badly done practical effects sometimes (it is like I know what they are going for, what their challenges and limitations are in a general sense and the informs my opinion). It doesn't mean practical effects are better by nature. But I was raised on decades of movie built around practical effects and you learned to appreciate them the way you might appreciate a magician performing tricks on stage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 85555, post: 9486045"] There are definitely films that do CGI well. I don't want to sound like too much of a crank lol. I think part of it for me isn't even the CGI itself, because when CGI first emerged, I remember being impressed in many instances. It is it is often used in ways that, for me at least, makes the movie look less aesthetically pleasing (some films it almost looks like the CGI department is intentionally thwarting the director or cinematographer with a muddy or disjointed color palette). It is less about the quality of the CGI than the overall look (I've seen movies with not great CGI but the color scheme fits, and it bother some less----I watch a lot of Chinese movies and shows with varying degrees of quality in the CGI and for me they often do a better job of choosing their colors). The other big issue, which I think a lot of people who grew up on practical effects share, is often the CGI lacks a sense of weight. I think this isn't inherent to CGI. I've seen plenty of CGI that gets weight right. But we all know of movies where you are watching an action scene and it doesn't feel believable because the objects and people don't feel tethered by physical laws, and don't seem to be interacting with the environment around them. Also there is something to be said for a car chase that involves real cars. But I have seen plenty of CGI where these things haven't been issues, and it added to the movies. The other thing about practical effects, and this might tie to your point about being older and having bias, is I know how to appreciate them just by being raised on them. I have a better sense of how they are done, and I know many of the special effects people by name, so I have of a grasp of the artistry behind it. I find this allows me to enjoy even badly done practical effects sometimes (it is like I know what they are going for, what their challenges and limitations are in a general sense and the informs my opinion). It doesn't mean practical effects are better by nature. But I was raised on decades of movie built around practical effects and you learned to appreciate them the way you might appreciate a magician performing tricks on stage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Best Horror Movies of All Time
Top