Yeah and that's a huge difference. Like, I love Taladas in 1989, but I don't really understand why I need, for example, a picture of like, a bunch of gnomes (I think) carrying a naked unconscious-looking human lady around (I'd ask "what was going on" re: these sort of images, but I think I know, and I don't like it), which is just completely unconnected to anything textual about the setting, cultures, species, etc. Just a random frown-inducing image, and one of a type that was common in 1980s D&D, but largely silently vanished in 1990s D&D (again save for reprints of earlier images, but those too became less common quite rapidly), and whose vanishing didn't seem to attract complaints, either (whereas the vanishing of chainmail bikini stuff, which was less creepy if very cheesy at times, did), which I think indicates a certain mens rea about it. I notice even the Deathbringer art they show has a lot of cheesy bikini stuff (weirdly more "old-fashioned"-seeming than real '80s and even some '70s stuff, I guess that's what going consciously retro but with a modern artist does), but it doesn't have, at least in the art they're showing, any damselification (instead it's more WWE vibes stuff like, yeah this villain-lady is being strangled, but by another woman so it's fine! Which like, huh, I guess I can't really argue with that lol).