Diamond bankruptcy settlement hits snag as Sparkle Pop files objection

Green Ronin makes statement on settlement over inventory still held by Sparkle Pop
diamondcomics.jpg

A settlement in the bankruptcy of distributor Diamond Comic Distributor was reached last month, but this week the company holding the warehouse assets of Diamond, Sparkle Pop, filed an objection. The settlement would have returned consignment inventory that has been held since January 2025 to be returned to companies including Paizo and Green Ronin, while $892,913 held in escrow from sales Sparkle Pop made of that held inventory would go to the Diamond Estate to pay off debts.

In their objection, Sparkle Pop claims they are owed $1 million in rent for the warehouse that holds the consignment inventory along with $433,270 in processing fees for the inventory it has sold. Another objection to the settlement is that it would allow third party companies to retrieve the inventory, arguing that the warehouse is a working distribution center with “floor-to-ceiling pallet racks requiring specialized equipment and trained operators”.

Sparkle Pop previously attempted to seize the inventory for unpaid rent in June, but that motion was denied.

Green Ronin Publishing, one of the members of the settlement, released a statement on the GoFundMe page for their legal expenses fighting for the return of their inventory:

We are, at long last, moving towards a resolution of our dispute with Diamond and if all goes well, we will be getting our books back before Xmas. As you may recall, the bankruptcy court appointed a trustee to oversee the liquidation of the remaining Diamond assets (the majority were bought by two companies, Universal Distribution and Sparkle Pop, last year). Last month the trustee and our group submitted a proposed settlement to the judge. Before anything else happens, the judge will have to accept the proposal. After that, there is still the matter of getting our books out of the Mississippi warehouse, which Sparkle Pop now owns. You know that saying that possession is nine-tenths of the law? Well, I won’t feel comfortable until our long-held hostage stock is out of that warehouse.

Our group, the Ad Hoc Committee of Consigners, must give some things up in this deal. Notably, a pot of money the court is holding from sales Sparkle Pop made after it had been ordered to stop selling. Green Ronin, thankfully, only has a small amount of money in this pot, but some of our cohort companies are giving up substantial cash to tie this all up. In addition to getting our product back, we’ll also be clear of our old contract for good and free from various forms of legal jeopardy that have come up in this case. It’s not everything our group wanted, but it’s a good deal for us nonetheless. Everyone just wants this resolved and over. I must once again give kudos to our lawyer Cate, who has been a rockstar throughout this process.

The next time I update I will hopefully be able to tell you that our books are safely in our warehouse. As always, thank you for all your support. We’d have lost all our consigned books without the money to put up a legal defense.

Thanks,
Chris

“Consignment inventory” is when a publisher or other manufactuere/wholesaler provides product to a distributor to sell on their behalf, with the consignment seller getting a portion of the sale price. The inventory still belongs to the publisher during this time.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darryl Mott

Darryl Mott

I'm surprised it's still a working distribution center; I'd have thought the courts would have locked it down by now - nothing moving in or out - until this all gets settled.
I'm assuming, but I don't really know. I assume it's working and the content is being held in trust. Can't image any court locking out the whole facility, but maybe.

Anyway, IMO its ridiculous how long this is taking to settle. IMO there should have be clear contracts, not the mess that apparently lacking with all the publishers and distributor etc. And then the parties should have been able to come to some reasonable agreement. Everyone should have agreed to take a loss. Share the pain, but seems like some are trying to get what they can at the cost to others.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Jeez, at this point they're just stalling to inflate the so-called losses. I hope the judge just tells them to shove it and stop interfering with the publishers getting back their inventory. I mean aren't you obligated to reduce your losses? If Sparkle Pop keeps loosing money because they refuse to let go of the inventory that was never theirs to even sell as an intermediary, every day they meddle to stall the process causes entirely self-inflicted harm.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top