Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Eberron and 4e - hopes and fears
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the illathid" data-source="post: 4025006" data-attributes="member: 59028"><p>I'd actually prefer if they didn't flat out replace any planes at all. I'd just have them say that the Feywild and Ethereal are equivalent, as are the Shadowfell and the Plane of Shadow (The other new planes don't seem like they need to be adapted into the setting).</p><p></p><p>My reasoning for this is that both the Feywild and Shadowfell appear to be transitive planes, but they each seem have traits similar to those of the (for lack of a better term) rotary planes. IIRC the Feywild seems to combine aspects of Thelanis, Lammania, & Irian, while the Shadowfell combines Mabar & Dolurrh.</p><p></p><p>Because of that I don't think it wouldn't be effective to map either the Feywild or Shadowfell to one of the rotary planes and just calling it a day. Instead, I think it would be the least intrusive for one to say that the Ethereal plane (i.e. Feywild) and the Plane of Shadow (i.e.) are actually always coterminous with the respective rotary planes planes I mentioned above.</p><p></p><p>Of course, all of this is hinging on the idea that there are in fact mechanical links to the transitive planes like there were in the 3e (e.g the spells Ethereal Jaunt and Shadow Walk). If there aren't any things like that I hope that they don't change the planes at all (and that we can get a planes of Eberron splat book)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the illathid, post: 4025006, member: 59028"] I'd actually prefer if they didn't flat out replace any planes at all. I'd just have them say that the Feywild and Ethereal are equivalent, as are the Shadowfell and the Plane of Shadow (The other new planes don't seem like they need to be adapted into the setting). My reasoning for this is that both the Feywild and Shadowfell appear to be transitive planes, but they each seem have traits similar to those of the (for lack of a better term) rotary planes. IIRC the Feywild seems to combine aspects of Thelanis, Lammania, & Irian, while the Shadowfell combines Mabar & Dolurrh. Because of that I don't think it wouldn't be effective to map either the Feywild or Shadowfell to one of the rotary planes and just calling it a day. Instead, I think it would be the least intrusive for one to say that the Ethereal plane (i.e. Feywild) and the Plane of Shadow (i.e.) are actually always coterminous with the respective rotary planes planes I mentioned above. Of course, all of this is hinging on the idea that there are in fact mechanical links to the transitive planes like there were in the 3e (e.g the spells Ethereal Jaunt and Shadow Walk). If there aren't any things like that I hope that they don't change the planes at all (and that we can get a planes of Eberron splat book) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Eberron and 4e - hopes and fears
Top