Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ENnies: Publisher feedback and suggestions sought on the future of the ENnies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaldaen" data-source="post: 1738866" data-attributes="member: 214"><p>Hmmm... perhaps there might be some happy middle ground here... instead of a quarterly ENnies which would certainly dilute the awards meaning... </p><p></p><p>What if we had year round judging where the judges announced one ENnies nominee for each quarter and then at the end of each year choosing one or two "wildcard" products to add to the annual ENnies ceremony.</p><p></p><p>This would do two things which I think will help both the ENnies and the publishers...</p><p></p><p>1) It will keep people (fans and publishers) engaged with the ENnies all year round while not diluting them.</p><p>2) Publishers who win the quarterly nomination of the ENnies would be able to advertise such when it matters most to them by putting the ENnies logo on their site and perhaps on their products (by ordering ENnies stickers or some such that can be placed on the physical product). This added benefit may encourage them to enter and even accept some of the monetary burden of the ENnies (i.e. by shipping directly to judges, nominal entry fees, and/or the designer dinners and other suggestions made by Pramas and Dextra).</p><p></p><p>There are downsides to this approach... </p><p></p><p>1) This is a major change to how things were done in the past and may not agree with everyone especially since you could have a relatively weak quarter where things that normally would not make the cut are given the nomination. A relatively strong quarter is partially addressed by the wildcard idea, but it may not be enough.</p><p>2) A lot more work for the volunteer ENnies staff and judges as you will have to keep judges on year round and they will have to meet multiple deadlines throughout the year, </p><p>3) If publishers are not sending product directly to judges then you will also have to gather and distribute products on a quarterly, if not monthly basis.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure there are other downsides, but I've got to get some work done today so I'll leave it there for others to debate the merits and downsides to this approach.</p><p></p><p>Have a Great Day!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaldaen, post: 1738866, member: 214"] Hmmm... perhaps there might be some happy middle ground here... instead of a quarterly ENnies which would certainly dilute the awards meaning... What if we had year round judging where the judges announced one ENnies nominee for each quarter and then at the end of each year choosing one or two "wildcard" products to add to the annual ENnies ceremony. This would do two things which I think will help both the ENnies and the publishers... 1) It will keep people (fans and publishers) engaged with the ENnies all year round while not diluting them. 2) Publishers who win the quarterly nomination of the ENnies would be able to advertise such when it matters most to them by putting the ENnies logo on their site and perhaps on their products (by ordering ENnies stickers or some such that can be placed on the physical product). This added benefit may encourage them to enter and even accept some of the monetary burden of the ENnies (i.e. by shipping directly to judges, nominal entry fees, and/or the designer dinners and other suggestions made by Pramas and Dextra). There are downsides to this approach... 1) This is a major change to how things were done in the past and may not agree with everyone especially since you could have a relatively weak quarter where things that normally would not make the cut are given the nomination. A relatively strong quarter is partially addressed by the wildcard idea, but it may not be enough. 2) A lot more work for the volunteer ENnies staff and judges as you will have to keep judges on year round and they will have to meet multiple deadlines throughout the year, 3) If publishers are not sending product directly to judges then you will also have to gather and distribute products on a quarterly, if not monthly basis. I'm sure there are other downsides, but I've got to get some work done today so I'll leave it there for others to debate the merits and downsides to this approach. Have a Great Day! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
ENnies: Publisher feedback and suggestions sought on the future of the ENnies
Top