Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rasyr" data-source="post: 1744193" data-attributes="member: 2855">Yes, for the ENnies, that is a good thing. And I particularly like how they he ENnies are done. Do I think that there could be improvements, yes, but not many.For example, the specific improvements to the ENnies I would like to see are as follows:1) Change the timeline -- Moving the elegibility period to end sooner in the year, or to the end of the previous year, so that the judges do not have to kill themselves or take time off work in order to be able  read all the products.2) Include judge summaries -- Have the judges write a summary of the products that could be preused prior to, and/or during the voting period. Thus voters who do not know what a specific product is can get an idea of what it is about.My prior comments were solely my thoughts on some of the ideas presented in this thread....How upset would I be if the ENnies did not implement the two  improvements I suggested above? Not upset at all. Those are things I would like to see, not things that I "want". For the most part, I think that the ENnies are just fine the way that they are.I would also be fine with most of the suggestions if they happened to be implemented as well. The only two that I would have a problem with are Fees for entering, and quarterly divisions.Fees would most certainly knock out a lot of smaller companies from entering, and I would prefer sending the products directly to the judges rather than fees. Quarterly divisions raise all sorts of other problems, most specifically considering that it can knock some very good products out of the running just because too many come out in the same quarter.</blockquote>

Verification