The mechanics of the various editions in the 1990s didn't always support the "monster within" aspect of the game, even if the flavor text claimed otherwise. (White Wolf was finding its way and figuring it out as they went, like a lot of game companies.)I definately back VtM on this one. We played it throughout the 90s and we hated the "Monster I Am, Less A Monster I Become" aspect. We always played it as a game of political intrigue within the society and had a much better game of it.
Literally JUST played a two-player "RaW" game with my kid. "Just" as in, he's still stomping the t-rex through the houses and hotels as I type this (he's 8). On more then one occasion I was able to get a property at under cost because I couldn't afford the list price, but I COULD outbid the cash he had on hand, so I opened up bidding. He did the same thing to me.When they don't have the funds to do so.
We also called it after "one more time around the board" after all of the properties were sold. Winner was "higest asset value + cash on hand," because I saw the game getting long and tedious. He still beat me. Again. 8 year old.I play RAW too. The game still sucks.
I have heard the same comment about Monopoly and Diplomacy, "The game to play with your friends when you absolutely want to have to find a new group of friends."Two things can be true:
1) Monopoly is a very dated game and was never a great game to begin with.
2) Everyone playing with house rules like "bonus cash on Free Parking" makes the game slower and worse.
That said, it's the most popular board game on Earth, so we'll all have to play a bunch more games of it before we die, ideally not in the middle of a game.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.