Ancalagon
Dusty Dragon
I had missed your earlier reply.Does it seem more likely that I'd be hesitant to label the thing I said was indefensible earlier in this topic or the list of things in your post immediately before mine that specifically uses the word objectionable?
I do find lazy historical inaccuracies in a game to be objectionable, esp if it turns out to be inaccuracies that were used to support hateful ideologies. But the word "objectionable", at least the way I use it, is "I disapprove of this", not "this is bigoted hate speech". It's regrettable that the game has these inaccuracies. It's unacceptable that a GOG newsletter uses several nazi-associates symbols in the title.
What did you mean by objectionable? (I can't insert tone here, but let me assure you, I'm not trying to be snarky at you, just trying to understand your post better)






