Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harpoon: delusions of grandeur or DM nightmare
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FoxWander" data-source="post: 3791188" data-attributes="member: 1356"><p>Hey everyone, I'm in this game as well so I appreciate all the replies/advice so far. Just to clarify though- I am NOT the harpoon wielding character. I just want to make the game fair for all of us players. I'd like to find a way for my friend to use his "harpoon build" that doesn't- 1) over-shadow the rest of us, 2) force the DM to use too powerful monsters that can withstand his attacks but will be too much for the rest of us to handle and 3) still lets the Harpooner use his character without feeling like he's been completely nerfed.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Until we paused the game to discuss how broken this use of the harpoon is, yes he was doing all the damage from the first attack. But we fixed that- Blades of Blood gets discharged with the first attack and you can't PA/Powerful Charge on a Heal check (which, by RAW, is what removing the harpoon is). I'm also thinking that the damage from Blades of Blood shouldn't count on the reflex save to avoid getting the harpoon stuck.</p><p></p><p>As was mentioned in the OP and later, the closest analogy for using the harpoon in melee is the javelin. But while the javelin specifically says it is "not designed for melee" and imposes a -4 to hit as a melee weapon, the harpoon doesn't have that exception. It's whole description does deal solely with ranged attacks though, so adding the same rule as the javelin seems pretty reasonable.</p><p></p><p>Nail brings up a good point about using the harpoon in melee not matching it's ranged use description so the "lodging" effect wouldn't apply. But, while that's a valid RAW way of avoiding the issue, it doesn't make much logical sense. Stabbing two-handed with a harpoon in melee (regardless of a -4 penalty to hit) will certainly hit harder than throwing it one-handed, which is why the 150% damage for two-handed weapons would apply. So how could a harder hit with a harpoon not lodge while a ranged hit would? It makes a lot more sense to simply say a hit is a hit and the lodging effect applies regardless (no matter how complicated that makes adjudicating the rest of the weapon's effects <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> )</p><p></p><p>So here's a proposal of how to deal with using a harpoon as a melee weapon:</p><p>1) It's not designed for melee so it imposes a -4 penalty to hit</p><p>2) If it deals damage there's a chance it is lodged in the target- reflex save DC10 + harpoon damage (BoB doesn't could but PA & PC would) to avoid.</p><p>3) Once lodged there is an opposed strength check to keep control of it. If the wielder is trying to keep control of the weapon then he doesn't threaten since his weapon is occupied, unless he has Quick Draw and another weapon (or something similar) and opts to let go of the harpoon to make an AoO.</p><p>4) If you loose control of the harpoon (whether by failing the STR check of voluntarily letting go for some reason) you can try to grab it again- this would be resolved as a disarm attempt.</p><p>5) If you have control of a lodged harpoon you can take a full round action to rip it out. This is a full round attack and does not provoke AoO. (The RAW say it's a Heal check but that's to remove it without doing extra damage, if you don't care about that then it should still be a full round action but not one that distracts you enough for AoO) Ripping a harpoon out like this does damage equal to the original attack but for the weapon + STR only. (No PA/PC or extra spell effects)</p><p></p><p>There- how does that sound? At least it's simpler than grappling. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> But seriously, I think that covers most of the differences from ranged use to melee use. And it's not completely devastating to the target of the attack. But does it make the harpoon fair to use? Or is it broken beyond repair even before this patch?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FoxWander, post: 3791188, member: 1356"] Hey everyone, I'm in this game as well so I appreciate all the replies/advice so far. Just to clarify though- I am NOT the harpoon wielding character. I just want to make the game fair for all of us players. I'd like to find a way for my friend to use his "harpoon build" that doesn't- 1) over-shadow the rest of us, 2) force the DM to use too powerful monsters that can withstand his attacks but will be too much for the rest of us to handle and 3) still lets the Harpooner use his character without feeling like he's been completely nerfed. Until we paused the game to discuss how broken this use of the harpoon is, yes he was doing all the damage from the first attack. But we fixed that- Blades of Blood gets discharged with the first attack and you can't PA/Powerful Charge on a Heal check (which, by RAW, is what removing the harpoon is). I'm also thinking that the damage from Blades of Blood shouldn't count on the reflex save to avoid getting the harpoon stuck. As was mentioned in the OP and later, the closest analogy for using the harpoon in melee is the javelin. But while the javelin specifically says it is "not designed for melee" and imposes a -4 to hit as a melee weapon, the harpoon doesn't have that exception. It's whole description does deal solely with ranged attacks though, so adding the same rule as the javelin seems pretty reasonable. Nail brings up a good point about using the harpoon in melee not matching it's ranged use description so the "lodging" effect wouldn't apply. But, while that's a valid RAW way of avoiding the issue, it doesn't make much logical sense. Stabbing two-handed with a harpoon in melee (regardless of a -4 penalty to hit) will certainly hit harder than throwing it one-handed, which is why the 150% damage for two-handed weapons would apply. So how could a harder hit with a harpoon not lodge while a ranged hit would? It makes a lot more sense to simply say a hit is a hit and the lodging effect applies regardless (no matter how complicated that makes adjudicating the rest of the weapon's effects :confused: ) So here's a proposal of how to deal with using a harpoon as a melee weapon: 1) It's not designed for melee so it imposes a -4 penalty to hit 2) If it deals damage there's a chance it is lodged in the target- reflex save DC10 + harpoon damage (BoB doesn't could but PA & PC would) to avoid. 3) Once lodged there is an opposed strength check to keep control of it. If the wielder is trying to keep control of the weapon then he doesn't threaten since his weapon is occupied, unless he has Quick Draw and another weapon (or something similar) and opts to let go of the harpoon to make an AoO. 4) If you loose control of the harpoon (whether by failing the STR check of voluntarily letting go for some reason) you can try to grab it again- this would be resolved as a disarm attempt. 5) If you have control of a lodged harpoon you can take a full round action to rip it out. This is a full round attack and does not provoke AoO. (The RAW say it's a Heal check but that's to remove it without doing extra damage, if you don't care about that then it should still be a full round action but not one that distracts you enough for AoO) Ripping a harpoon out like this does damage equal to the original attack but for the weapon + STR only. (No PA/PC or extra spell effects) There- how does that sound? At least it's simpler than grappling. :) But seriously, I think that covers most of the differences from ranged use to melee use. And it's not completely devastating to the target of the attack. But does it make the harpoon fair to use? Or is it broken beyond repair even before this patch? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Harpoon: delusions of grandeur or DM nightmare
Top