Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Belbarid" data-source="post: 3966187" data-attributes="member: 28213">Yup.  Don't go there.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Okay, assuming that you're going to ignore my first thought, I have a few *serious* comments.  Questions to ponder, really.Are you going with the (nonsensical, IMO) 3rd ed notion that all vampires are Chaotic Evil?Are you willing to live with serious party conflict?Are you willing to live with a situation where a priest of good ignores a vampire because the player doesn't want to cause conflict?Are you willing to live with a party full of vampires?  'Cause I'd totally go there if my DM was fool enough to make me a vampire.Think through a few of these, and I believe your answer will be a bit clearer.  Either "Not really an issue because the PC can play a Jander Sunstar kind of vampire.  We may have a few tense moments, but all will work out" or "There's no way this is going to work" are the most likely choices, but that doesn't mean that they're the only ones.To your specific question, I don't see there being anything that can hide something like vampirism from a group that travels and lives as closely as an adventuring group does.  It's just going to come out somehow.</blockquote>