Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How to design 4th edition D&D to limit buffing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ashockney" data-source="post: 2971169" data-attributes="member: 1363"><p>The solution that resulted from the above post, and that I've playtested quite a bit involves the following type of model:</p><p></p><p>There are hundreds of things that provide buffs, of varying duration, and varying "stackability" and varying modifiers. There are only a handful of true needs for buffs and debuffs:</p><p></p><p>Movement</p><p>Type of Movement</p><p>Number of Attacks</p><p>Attack</p><p>Damage</p><p>AC</p><p>Saves</p><p>Damage Avoidance</p><p>Damage Reduction</p><p>Immunity</p><p>HP</p><p></p><p>Everything fits inside these bubbles pretty nicely. With that in mind, the system presented in 3.0 and 3.5 is way, way to complex at higher levels. Alternatively, I've worked with a system that changes two key things to RADICALLY simplify the game, but still maintain the fun playability. One of those is directly related to "buffs." In my "simple" view, all I did was say the following:</p><p></p><p>1) If your class can use a spell or ability that affects a character with a "buff", change all types to "buff". No more sacred, luck, resistance, enhancement, etc.</p><p>2) When you use the spell or ability the bonus is equal to the stated bonus or the spell level, whichever is higher. </p><p>3) When you use the stated ability, it applies to the same targets as stated in the spell or ability currently.</p><p>4) The buff lasts for one combat.</p><p>5) Buff bonuses don't stack.</p><p></p><p>It's insanely simpler (in fact, overly-simplified), but works much better to improve accounting and speed up the combats.</p><p></p><p>For 4e, I would recommend a derivative of the above. I think that the different classes should be capable of modifying and providing bonuses to these different categories. For example, the best AC buffs in the game are provided by the cleric class, while the best attack buffs in the game are provided by the wizards, etc. There would be acces sto "lower grade" buffs at higher levels from the non-core buffer categories. The best buff combinations in the game should be those that require a combined effect (ie, I've got the ultimate combo: a 6 bard song + a 9 wizard buff + a 9 cleric buff = the maximum buff benefit available). These buff routines should be fairly standard, and preformatted. You can do all kinds of fun things with the durations and strength. For example, 3rd level attack bonus buff:</p><p></p><p>Immediate Action: -3 to opponents attack roll</p><p>Swift Action: +3 to your attack roll</p><p>Standard Action: +3 to target creatures attack roll for one combat</p><p>Full Turn: +3 to attack rolls of all allies for one combat</p><p></p><p>This might be the buffing array of one particular class specialty - arcane casters. Wizards could cast it at 5th level, and other classes that provide support: clerics/bards, etc. might be able to provide this buff at 6th - 9th level.</p><p></p><p>If they got really "cool" they could even consider the above a standard "condition", and factor it into the existing "condition" rules that affect movement/position/obstacles/allies, etc.</p><p></p><p>So, for example, the above could be "Diving Attack" - which is a specific combat condition to be in. A PC might be able to "trigger" this condition themselves through the use of the appropriate feat/skill success/environment combinations, or simply be put artificially into this condition through the use of a buff. The condition could then be modified by other characters' actions and/or changes to the environment. </p><p></p><p>So, for example: </p><p>A swashbuckling/acrobatic rogue and his Arcane Trickster friend are squaring off against an bullette. The bullette's armor is difficult to penetrate for these two, so they decide it would be best to spend "actions" to better position their attacks. At 5th level, the best condition to do that for them is the "diving attack" condition which provides a +3 attack bonus. It can be provided the arcane trickster casting a 3rd level wizard buff spell (levitating assault). He can do this to himself as a free action, or he can use a standard action to provide this bonus to himself or his companion for the rest of the combat. He throws it on the swashbuckling rogue, and it provides him with the ability to flot as if levitating or in low gravity, and consistently obtain "attack from above" bonuses, etc. However, the swashbuckling rogue can actually achieve a "diving attack" condition on his own, access through feat/class combination, with as successful MEA and "Tumble" check.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ashockney, post: 2971169, member: 1363"] The solution that resulted from the above post, and that I've playtested quite a bit involves the following type of model: There are hundreds of things that provide buffs, of varying duration, and varying "stackability" and varying modifiers. There are only a handful of true needs for buffs and debuffs: Movement Type of Movement Number of Attacks Attack Damage AC Saves Damage Avoidance Damage Reduction Immunity HP Everything fits inside these bubbles pretty nicely. With that in mind, the system presented in 3.0 and 3.5 is way, way to complex at higher levels. Alternatively, I've worked with a system that changes two key things to RADICALLY simplify the game, but still maintain the fun playability. One of those is directly related to "buffs." In my "simple" view, all I did was say the following: 1) If your class can use a spell or ability that affects a character with a "buff", change all types to "buff". No more sacred, luck, resistance, enhancement, etc. 2) When you use the spell or ability the bonus is equal to the stated bonus or the spell level, whichever is higher. 3) When you use the stated ability, it applies to the same targets as stated in the spell or ability currently. 4) The buff lasts for one combat. 5) Buff bonuses don't stack. It's insanely simpler (in fact, overly-simplified), but works much better to improve accounting and speed up the combats. For 4e, I would recommend a derivative of the above. I think that the different classes should be capable of modifying and providing bonuses to these different categories. For example, the best AC buffs in the game are provided by the cleric class, while the best attack buffs in the game are provided by the wizards, etc. There would be acces sto "lower grade" buffs at higher levels from the non-core buffer categories. The best buff combinations in the game should be those that require a combined effect (ie, I've got the ultimate combo: a 6 bard song + a 9 wizard buff + a 9 cleric buff = the maximum buff benefit available). These buff routines should be fairly standard, and preformatted. You can do all kinds of fun things with the durations and strength. For example, 3rd level attack bonus buff: Immediate Action: -3 to opponents attack roll Swift Action: +3 to your attack roll Standard Action: +3 to target creatures attack roll for one combat Full Turn: +3 to attack rolls of all allies for one combat This might be the buffing array of one particular class specialty - arcane casters. Wizards could cast it at 5th level, and other classes that provide support: clerics/bards, etc. might be able to provide this buff at 6th - 9th level. If they got really "cool" they could even consider the above a standard "condition", and factor it into the existing "condition" rules that affect movement/position/obstacles/allies, etc. So, for example, the above could be "Diving Attack" - which is a specific combat condition to be in. A PC might be able to "trigger" this condition themselves through the use of the appropriate feat/skill success/environment combinations, or simply be put artificially into this condition through the use of a buff. The condition could then be modified by other characters' actions and/or changes to the environment. So, for example: A swashbuckling/acrobatic rogue and his Arcane Trickster friend are squaring off against an bullette. The bullette's armor is difficult to penetrate for these two, so they decide it would be best to spend "actions" to better position their attacks. At 5th level, the best condition to do that for them is the "diving attack" condition which provides a +3 attack bonus. It can be provided the arcane trickster casting a 3rd level wizard buff spell (levitating assault). He can do this to himself as a free action, or he can use a standard action to provide this bonus to himself or his companion for the rest of the combat. He throws it on the swashbuckling rogue, and it provides him with the ability to flot as if levitating or in low gravity, and consistently obtain "attack from above" bonuses, etc. However, the swashbuckling rogue can actually achieve a "diving attack" condition on his own, access through feat/class combination, with as successful MEA and "Tumble" check. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How to design 4th edition D&D to limit buffing
Top