Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How We Beat the HD, HotDQ, Spoilers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 6397613" data-attributes="member: 15700"><p>Really?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, no spinning there. That's what you directly said.</p><p></p><p>That one sentence said that the rate of cheating has stayed the same over the past 50 years. That one sentence throws your entire position out of the window. It was funny because it was an article that you linked to support your claim. I can only guess you didn't even bother to read your own sources. Which is not shocking, because here you are again, making some pretty outrageous claims about something that clearly have on idea about (being ordered to go into a dangerous situation).</p><p></p><p>I didn't say you said they weren't brave. Again, there is no spin here. I said one of the reasons they did so was <em>because </em>they were brave. That's an important factor to explain why people do things that you hadn't considered. Instead you seemed to imply that people who were intelligent wouldn't do such acts of heroism because of risk assessment. To which I called bogus on because I've personally seen many people who were very intelligent do such things. Your entire argument seems to be boiling down to that PCs shouldn't fight Cyan because they aren't stupid, which completely ignores the many times people do do things because they are brave, were ordered to, etc. I gotta tell you, my son is a firefighter. If the wasn't willing to risk his life to save someone else, he <em>wouldn't be a firefighter</em>. That comes with the job. Just like in the military, when I had a mission to do, I did it, regardless of risk or danger. I was a blackhawk helicopter crewchief. If my pilot said, "Sorry, we aren't going into that medivac mission because the odds are we'll get shot down.", there would be a few less soldiers alive today. And PCs are heroes, right? At least the good aligned ones? </p><p></p><p>Same thing with the LG thing. If a LG character is willing to break his or her word whenever it's convenient and the LE person isn't? That should tell you that maybe you need to reassess what lawful good means. Especially with the definition of "lawful".</p><p></p><p>If you want "D&D Easy Hand-held Mode", more power to you. But don't start complaining how horrible a scenario is because it forces you actually make decisions on whether or not you should go into combat rather than just assume every combat you would ever face is beatable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 6397613, member: 15700"] Really? Sorry, no spinning there. That's what you directly said. That one sentence said that the rate of cheating has stayed the same over the past 50 years. That one sentence throws your entire position out of the window. It was funny because it was an article that you linked to support your claim. I can only guess you didn't even bother to read your own sources. Which is not shocking, because here you are again, making some pretty outrageous claims about something that clearly have on idea about (being ordered to go into a dangerous situation). I didn't say you said they weren't brave. Again, there is no spin here. I said one of the reasons they did so was [I]because [/I]they were brave. That's an important factor to explain why people do things that you hadn't considered. Instead you seemed to imply that people who were intelligent wouldn't do such acts of heroism because of risk assessment. To which I called bogus on because I've personally seen many people who were very intelligent do such things. Your entire argument seems to be boiling down to that PCs shouldn't fight Cyan because they aren't stupid, which completely ignores the many times people do do things because they are brave, were ordered to, etc. I gotta tell you, my son is a firefighter. If the wasn't willing to risk his life to save someone else, he [I]wouldn't be a firefighter[/I]. That comes with the job. Just like in the military, when I had a mission to do, I did it, regardless of risk or danger. I was a blackhawk helicopter crewchief. If my pilot said, "Sorry, we aren't going into that medivac mission because the odds are we'll get shot down.", there would be a few less soldiers alive today. And PCs are heroes, right? At least the good aligned ones? Same thing with the LG thing. If a LG character is willing to break his or her word whenever it's convenient and the LE person isn't? That should tell you that maybe you need to reassess what lawful good means. Especially with the definition of "lawful". If you want "D&D Easy Hand-held Mode", more power to you. But don't start complaining how horrible a scenario is because it forces you actually make decisions on whether or not you should go into combat rather than just assume every combat you would ever face is beatable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How We Beat the HD, HotDQ, Spoilers
Top