Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
Is my warblade/swordsage build legal?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kigmatzomat" data-source="post: 3032588" data-attributes="member: 9254"><p>I don't see anything illegal about it. IIRC, there are a few 1st level maneuvers and/or stances that have pre-reqs of "1 maneuver of same discipline" and nothing I've seen says that you can't use your other 1st level maneuvers to qualify. </p><p></p><p>I find the martial adept Initiator Level mechanic to be a little odd in comparison to Caster Level because of the level sharing. You can't mix a sorceror 1 with a wizard 16 to gain access to 9th level spells. It seems very much a PrC type of mechanic. It makes me unhappy, as it seems like the old "dipping" problem where someone would take 1 level of ranger to get a fist full of feats. </p><p></p><p>I can easily see a munchkinesque tactic of being a multiclass Crusader2/ Warblade2/ Sword Sage2. That would give you several auto-refreshing 1st level maneuvers, a couple easily refreshed 2nd level maneuvers, and a whole bunch of rarely refreshed 3rd level maneuvers, not to mention 4 or 5 stances. BAB is +5, fantabulous saves, and a scadload of specials. As long as you aren't worried about going epic and losing the epic bonus feats, this is a rich combo. </p><p></p><p>I've considered putting a house-rule limit on cross-class initiator levels to 4x the base MA class level to prevent the 20th level fighter IMC from immediately qualifying for 6th level maneuvers. That mechanic would, in your example, limit you to 2nd level sword sage maneuvers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kigmatzomat, post: 3032588, member: 9254"] I don't see anything illegal about it. IIRC, there are a few 1st level maneuvers and/or stances that have pre-reqs of "1 maneuver of same discipline" and nothing I've seen says that you can't use your other 1st level maneuvers to qualify. I find the martial adept Initiator Level mechanic to be a little odd in comparison to Caster Level because of the level sharing. You can't mix a sorceror 1 with a wizard 16 to gain access to 9th level spells. It seems very much a PrC type of mechanic. It makes me unhappy, as it seems like the old "dipping" problem where someone would take 1 level of ranger to get a fist full of feats. I can easily see a munchkinesque tactic of being a multiclass Crusader2/ Warblade2/ Sword Sage2. That would give you several auto-refreshing 1st level maneuvers, a couple easily refreshed 2nd level maneuvers, and a whole bunch of rarely refreshed 3rd level maneuvers, not to mention 4 or 5 stances. BAB is +5, fantabulous saves, and a scadload of specials. As long as you aren't worried about going epic and losing the epic bonus feats, this is a rich combo. I've considered putting a house-rule limit on cross-class initiator levels to 4x the base MA class level to prevent the 20th level fighter IMC from immediately qualifying for 6th level maneuvers. That mechanic would, in your example, limit you to 2nd level sword sage maneuvers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
Is my warblade/swordsage build legal?
Top