Alzrius
The EN World kitten
I didn't see a thread on this:
kotaku.com
Essentially, WotC created an internal website regarding the upcoming election for unionization among their employees, including a list of employees eligible to vote with the National Labor Relations Board (as part of voting for employees who worked remotely). This list, which was accessible to everyone at the company, deadnamed multiple trans employees. When this was pointed out to them, WotC removed the list and instead switched the voting process for remote-work employees to an email system.
However, when the time came to actually vote, those employees found that the list given to the NLRB was the same one that WotC had used previously, deadnames and all. The article, at this point, confirms that "Union elections with the NLRB do not require use of legal names nor showing of ID—they just require employees confirming they are the same person that is on the list the NLRB is given." In contrast to this, when WotC sent around an apology email (included in the article), they stated that "The use of those legal names versus preferred names was part of a legal process." No explanation is given as to exactly what legal process this was a part of.
For people who wonder why some of us seem to be perpetually exasperated with WotC, and can't give them the benefit of the doubt, recurring things like this, for which other people pay the price, are why.
WOTC Deadnamed Its Trans Employees During Union Election, Twice
'The actions here are...at odds with the kindness and support I experience daily'
Essentially, WotC created an internal website regarding the upcoming election for unionization among their employees, including a list of employees eligible to vote with the National Labor Relations Board (as part of voting for employees who worked remotely). This list, which was accessible to everyone at the company, deadnamed multiple trans employees. When this was pointed out to them, WotC removed the list and instead switched the voting process for remote-work employees to an email system.
However, when the time came to actually vote, those employees found that the list given to the NLRB was the same one that WotC had used previously, deadnames and all. The article, at this point, confirms that "Union elections with the NLRB do not require use of legal names nor showing of ID—they just require employees confirming they are the same person that is on the list the NLRB is given." In contrast to this, when WotC sent around an apology email (included in the article), they stated that "The use of those legal names versus preferred names was part of a legal process." No explanation is given as to exactly what legal process this was a part of.
For people who wonder why some of us seem to be perpetually exasperated with WotC, and can't give them the benefit of the doubt, recurring things like this, for which other people pay the price, are why.






