HellHound said:First comment:
Rule 43 doesn't indicate what progressions are for what classes. Further, if a character multiclasses in a class with a poor defense bonus, his or her defense bonus actually goes DOWN by one for multiclassing.
I have general issues with Improved Weapon Finesse, especially in Dragonstar or other settings where ranged weapons and thus Dex is already of primary importance. This further reduces the Strength stat to be a dump stat for everyone, including would-be tank fighters.
Rule 26 - I'm assuming the bonded weapon is treated as the ancestral daisho of a samurai, right?
What are Dragon Aspect and Dragon Blooded from - why not include the stats for these in the house rules?
Storyteller01 said:As for the feat, having Str as a dump stat isn't too much of an issue for me. Tank fighters (melee anyway) become obsolete against ranged attacks doing 2d8 to 3d8 in damage. It gets worse when the combat takes place at ranges of 300 - 500 feet. Melee fighter just sits there...
Or it should just be built in as a class feature.HellHound said:If the feat becomes required for a character, then it is probably too good, IMO.
HellHound said:All this goes on to make that feat more than good, but a necessity. If the feat becomes required for a character, then it is probably too good, IMO.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.