Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Primitive Screwhead" data-source="post: 2913598" data-attributes="member: 20805">RC, I read over the alignement and personality pieces last night.. First off, I am highly impressed with the quality of the writing. These alignment definitions {that are being instated into my game from now on out} are the best guidelines given for both characters and cultures. As a matter of fact, I am going to go outside my usual abhorance of alignment and add 'Favored Alignment' to my [Race and Culture] project!  {side note for people confused by this part of the post, RC provided me a draft to proof/playtest..so I have a bit more info than what is posted above}As to the personality stuff.. I have Penumbra's most excellent book but have lacked a group willing to go that in depth on the social side. You implementation is clean and provides a mechanical advantage to playing a particular character type.  Some of the conditions may be relatively simple to achieve {fx, the 'Use Aid Another' action in combat or skill} while others alot more complex {schemer.. my favorite character type by the way <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />} This may lead to meta-game choices for character types. Not sure if this is fixable or even a problemMore readig tonight!Asta.</blockquote>