Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No More "Humans in Funny Hats": Racial Mechanics Should Determine Racial Cultures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Christian" data-source="post: 8449414" data-attributes="member: 6901101"><p>Ok... so can you try to explain it with the only thing we are debating about - point buy or standard array. Because I feel certain you can't. The truth is, the only reason to have a 16 or 17 is because you want the extra +1 in the primary stat. There is no other build you can't do without traditional ASI - except that magical 16 or 17, which doesn't really matter for effectiveness. </p><p></p><p>As I stated earlier, no one is against the exception. Everyone... and I mean everyone who plays 5e as the rules state, is okay with the halfling having the same strength as the half-orc. Everyone is okay with the dwarf as having the same intelligence as the elf. Everyone is okay with having the dragonborne having the same dex as the halfling. </p><p>The only thing they want, again, to make a difference in race (to turn a knob), is that it takes the halfling, dwarf or dragonborne a bit longer. Four levels to be exact. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But... I want it at level one!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is all anyone sees in the argument. I get why you want it. To make a character in the image you want them. But here is the outlying facts:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If you say stats aren't that important, then it shouldn't matter if it takes four extra levels</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If you say it's how you envision your character, then stats do matter, and you envision your character with an extra +1 - just like the other races that get an extra +1</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">But if you claim that is an individual trait, then all PCs that are your class have the same individual trait - which therefore makes them no longer individuals, but commonplace</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If you say it's just not fair, then you are refusing to look at what the other racial feats offer in regard to your class</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">And if you say, no I just want the same as everyone else because I want that +3.... good for you. You are to be commended. And guess what.... wish granted, as that is now the lay of the land.</li> </ul><p>I will be truthful. I do not care. One bit. I do not think it matters. The D&D realm is so fantastical and diverse, it does not matter. But, I find it insulting to the people who do care, when someone argues on the openness, yet clearly can't demonstrate or disprove the logic and math laid before them. It is insulting to that player's or DM's <em>feel</em> of the game. It is dismissive and has a wreak of arrogance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Christian, post: 8449414, member: 6901101"] Ok... so can you try to explain it with the only thing we are debating about - point buy or standard array. Because I feel certain you can't. The truth is, the only reason to have a 16 or 17 is because you want the extra +1 in the primary stat. There is no other build you can't do without traditional ASI - except that magical 16 or 17, which doesn't really matter for effectiveness. As I stated earlier, no one is against the exception. Everyone... and I mean everyone who plays 5e as the rules state, is okay with the halfling having the same strength as the half-orc. Everyone is okay with the dwarf as having the same intelligence as the elf. Everyone is okay with having the dragonborne having the same dex as the halfling. The only thing they want, again, to make a difference in race (to turn a knob), is that it takes the halfling, dwarf or dragonborne a bit longer. Four levels to be exact. But... I want it at level one! That is all anyone sees in the argument. I get why you want it. To make a character in the image you want them. But here is the outlying facts: [LIST] [*]If you say stats aren't that important, then it shouldn't matter if it takes four extra levels [*]If you say it's how you envision your character, then stats do matter, and you envision your character with an extra +1 - just like the other races that get an extra +1 [*]But if you claim that is an individual trait, then all PCs that are your class have the same individual trait - which therefore makes them no longer individuals, but commonplace [*]If you say it's just not fair, then you are refusing to look at what the other racial feats offer in regard to your class [*]And if you say, no I just want the same as everyone else because I want that +3.... good for you. You are to be commended. And guess what.... wish granted, as that is now the lay of the land. [/LIST] I will be truthful. I do not care. One bit. I do not think it matters. The D&D realm is so fantastical and diverse, it does not matter. But, I find it insulting to the people who do care, when someone argues on the openness, yet clearly can't demonstrate or disprove the logic and math laid before them. It is insulting to that player's or DM's [I]feel[/I] of the game. It is dismissive and has a wreak of arrogance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No More "Humans in Funny Hats": Racial Mechanics Should Determine Racial Cultures
Top