I agree, I don't think he's any of those either. But he may be a little too obsessed with the nostalgia gamer market because it sure sounds like he'd dally with Nazis to chase the nostalgia for some of those old products. And while he may be able to make an economic case for bringing updates and reprints to market, I can't see an ethical case for giving the remaining Bledsaws the reflected limelight that will come their way when we should be united in letting them starve for attention.
What limelight?
Bledsaw is still doing whatever it is that he does -without financial gain, without his company benefiting, and without any perceivable change in what his situation already was.
For me, I can only echo what I already said in past threads: I don't feel that some guy being bitter on Facebook should be given control over whether or not I enjoy something.
At the same time, Goodman Games is doing what they do: positive community engagement and producing quality content that I enjoy.
I expect that to continue to be the case with their Elric campaign.
If, between now and then, GG hires a law firm to prevent better working conditions at my office, hires a private 'investigation' agency to try to break my legs, and/or something of similar detrimental impact to myself or the community, I will feel differently.
As it stands, I plan to support the Elric campaign. The boxed set will go on the shelf with the other sets related to Appendix N*.
*No R.E. Howard DCC yet, but I see a Kickstarter campaign for some cool Conan stuff from Monolith.