Sunday in my primary 4E game, we had 2 new players. They brought in dwarven characters, a fighter and paladin. They also had a frighteningly different view of how Marking works. My other group is also playing 4E, but I'm playing the fighter and none of us ever used a mark in the following manner.
I've reread the text and want to make sure I'm reading and interpretting correctly.
You must 'attack' in order to Mark an opponent. Whether that attack is a basic melee attack, exploit or smite, you actually have to attack in order for the marks to take effect.
What the new guys were doing was moving somewhere into open space, 3 or 4 spaces away, "marking or challenging" the bad guys and then sitting there waiting for the bad guys to come to them.
It seems even more explicit that if the paladin doesn't attack or at least end his movement next to an opponent, he can't mark them.
And the fighter and paladin are the only classes, (at least as far as the PHB 1 goes) that can 'mark'?
I've reread the text and want to make sure I'm reading and interpretting correctly.
You must 'attack' in order to Mark an opponent. Whether that attack is a basic melee attack, exploit or smite, you actually have to attack in order for the marks to take effect.
What the new guys were doing was moving somewhere into open space, 3 or 4 spaces away, "marking or challenging" the bad guys and then sitting there waiting for the bad guys to come to them.
It seems even more explicit that if the paladin doesn't attack or at least end his movement next to an opponent, he can't mark them.
And the fighter and paladin are the only classes, (at least as far as the PHB 1 goes) that can 'mark'?