Party Choices...

[Nifft]

Which party would you rather play in?

Thanks, -- N

PS: Add party compositions that you prefer in the thread -- we'll run it again with the less-popular poll choices replaced by the more-popular thread combos.

 

[Felix]

I like the idea of a stealthy party, but probably would do it with some multiclassing...
Rogue/Fighter
Ranger
Rogue/Sorcerer [or Wiz]
Bard

 

[diaglo]

3d6 in order. let the each player decide what they want to play.

and roll with it.

i like jello

 

[Corsair]

You left out the option of "mixed, without a theme but without stepping on anyones toes". The sort of party where you might have a paladin, druid, beguiler, and warmage working together. Certainly not a "pre-fab" four, but you still hit all your main bases.

 

[JustaPlayer]

I picked Arcane Wierdos. But I like jello too.

 

[green slime]

I voted for Jello too.

Primarily because there were many options which I found equally appealing, and some others which I find appealing which were not present on the list:

Theme Pretty: Paladin, Sorceror, Bard, Favoured Soul

Theme Nature: Druid, Ranger, Barbarian, Wu-jen

Theme Evil: Blackguard, Dread Necromancer, Assassin, True Necromancer

 

[Rodrigo Istalindir]

I'd have picked 'Stealthy' but I can't abide monks.

 

[Ravellion]

The Psi team. In most setting, the psi factor alone could be a source to party cohesion. It still fills all the roles, no one steals each other's spotlight all the time, and generally seems like a good theme.

 

[CrimsonWineGlass]

I had to take arcane wierdos. I guess that would just be a fun party to do, maybe a hard one, but fun all the same.

 

[LostSoul]

I'll play the Ranger in the stealthy team.