Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Should you be able to use 'bonus saves' to help folks get out of 'end of turn' stuff?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5262542" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>I've actually allowed solo monsters to do this in my campaigns and the effect is pretty dramatic. Solos can save against daze, dominate, stun and unconscious conditions as if they were save ends. So if they get afflicted by one of these "until the end of X players" turn, it means they can save it at their normal bonus. If they fail it still ends as normal anyway.</p><p></p><p>What this has resulted in is that PCs no longer bother loading up on non-save ends until end of next turn daze, dominate, stun and unconscious effects. They're now absolutely worse than a save ends power against solos, because they aren't modified by anything that affects saving throws (as the solos saving throw is from a power, not because they count as save ends effects in any way - despite being saveable). It also means that solos are very hard to permanently lock down just by throwing powers like destructive salutation at them round after round. Especially with a single immediate interrupt save, as they count the stun as save ends either way, so missing with destructive salutation is no longer superior to hitting with it. If they fail vs. the miss it only lasts until the wizards next turn anyway, but failing vs. the hit means it may last much longer.</p><p></p><p>The result is solo battles that play much better, are more fun and don't end up being the PCs whacking on a defenseless creature for 3 rounds until it dies. I have been very tempted to use a "shake off" rule for non-save ends effects for a while - applied generally. This is because in my mind, save ends effects should be the be all and end all of effects. If it's not save ends, it shouldn't be anywhere near as good. Yet 4E too strongly rewards powers that are until the end of a creatures turn as compared to save ends, because there is very little you can do about them - with copious ways of saving a save ends effect (or strong bonuses for monsters).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5262542, member: 78116"] I've actually allowed solo monsters to do this in my campaigns and the effect is pretty dramatic. Solos can save against daze, dominate, stun and unconscious conditions as if they were save ends. So if they get afflicted by one of these "until the end of X players" turn, it means they can save it at their normal bonus. If they fail it still ends as normal anyway. What this has resulted in is that PCs no longer bother loading up on non-save ends until end of next turn daze, dominate, stun and unconscious effects. They're now absolutely worse than a save ends power against solos, because they aren't modified by anything that affects saving throws (as the solos saving throw is from a power, not because they count as save ends effects in any way - despite being saveable). It also means that solos are very hard to permanently lock down just by throwing powers like destructive salutation at them round after round. Especially with a single immediate interrupt save, as they count the stun as save ends either way, so missing with destructive salutation is no longer superior to hitting with it. If they fail vs. the miss it only lasts until the wizards next turn anyway, but failing vs. the hit means it may last much longer. The result is solo battles that play much better, are more fun and don't end up being the PCs whacking on a defenseless creature for 3 rounds until it dies. I have been very tempted to use a "shake off" rule for non-save ends effects for a while - applied generally. This is because in my mind, save ends effects should be the be all and end all of effects. If it's not save ends, it shouldn't be anywhere near as good. Yet 4E too strongly rewards powers that are until the end of a creatures turn as compared to save ends, because there is very little you can do about them - with copious ways of saving a save ends effect (or strong bonuses for monsters). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Should you be able to use 'bonus saves' to help folks get out of 'end of turn' stuff?
Top