Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JacktheRabbit" data-source="post: 768111" data-attributes="member: 525">Want some opinions from fellow DM's.Two weapon fighting, should there be enough feats to allow you to completely offset all negatives for two weapon fighting? OR should there always be at least a -2 primary/ -2 secondary or say a 0 primary / -2 secondary?Currently I have a player that wields a double bladed sword. He has taken enough feats to remove all negatives from his attacks. So at 7th level he is +11/+6 primary and +11 secondary.So far I am not sure I like this. Its true that he had to spend 4 feats to get to this level:ambidexteritytwo weapon fightingimproved two weapon fightingexotic weapon skill double swordand he is limited to a weapon that is light in his off hand.Do other DM's see this as ok? I am torn. Part of me things that no matter how many feats you take you shouldnt be as skilled with two weapons as someone is with one. There should always be a negative somewhere. The other part of me says the negative is in the 4 feats he had to spend and that balances things out over all.Right now I am letting the player do this. The question will arise if this character dies and his next is a clone of him or if someone else wants to follow the same concept.</blockquote>