Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ultimate Creatures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xylix" data-source="post: 501234" data-attributes="member: 9089"><p>Figher = ~413 levels of figher + 20 levels of monk</p><p></p><p>Full dual wielding, so that both hands get full attack progression.</p><p>Flury, for the extra attack (you are going to hit anyway!)</p><p></p><p></p><p>+100 damage weapon, 35 strength weapon (or so), +226 damage power attack = ~360 damage from power attack.</p><p></p><p>11 attacks WILL hit on a 2 or better against a mere 103 AC = ~4000 damage a round!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Potentially it could be much higher if the player really built for it. But this is high enough. 80 Strength does not seem all that out of reach for a 433 level character. A single epic buff could probably provide 40 of it. Plus those 108 lose character points to spend wherever he desires... and those +5 inheriant bonuses, and that peramantent anti-antimagic field epic spell on him = devestation to the max....</p><p></p><p>Didn't even include the hasted attack come to think of it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would readily agree with that. But instead of dropping it so far I am more likely to knock it down to 2/- then add an increasing Con requirement with every taking, to limit the amount the player can get his hands on.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is certainly less minimal then 10 and 20th level, but it is still pretty big differance. Especially when you factor in feats. Besides, such a character would be loaded on permanent epic spells, and less permanent buffs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>High level epic characters are scary <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xylix, post: 501234, member: 9089"] Figher = ~413 levels of figher + 20 levels of monk Full dual wielding, so that both hands get full attack progression. Flury, for the extra attack (you are going to hit anyway!) +100 damage weapon, 35 strength weapon (or so), +226 damage power attack = ~360 damage from power attack. 11 attacks WILL hit on a 2 or better against a mere 103 AC = ~4000 damage a round! Potentially it could be much higher if the player really built for it. But this is high enough. 80 Strength does not seem all that out of reach for a 433 level character. A single epic buff could probably provide 40 of it. Plus those 108 lose character points to spend wherever he desires... and those +5 inheriant bonuses, and that peramantent anti-antimagic field epic spell on him = devestation to the max.... Didn't even include the hasted attack come to think of it ;) I would readily agree with that. But instead of dropping it so far I am more likely to knock it down to 2/- then add an increasing Con requirement with every taking, to limit the amount the player can get his hands on. It is certainly less minimal then 10 and 20th level, but it is still pretty big differance. Especially when you factor in feats. Besides, such a character would be loaded on permanent epic spells, and less permanent buffs. High level epic characters are scary ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ultimate Creatures
Top