We stopped playing Daggerheart

[Umbran]

That seems quite different from worldbuilding with an eye towards verisimilitude.

Your uninformed opinion means what, to me, exactly?

 

[Umbran]

Adversaries explicitly do not have the Armor mechanic

The question was not posed to be specifically about non-players, so I included the IF it had armor...

 

[Micah Sweet]

it represents whatever happened in game / the players decided the die roll to mean. It does not simulate something specific if that is what you are after

That is pretty much always what I'm after, thank you.

 

[Micah Sweet]

Your uninformed opinion means what, to me, exactly?

If I'm off-base, perhaps you can explain. Or at least be a little less dismissive of an honest thought.

 

[Umbran]

You roleplay emotions if you want to keep it simulative.

Speak for yourself, not for others, please.

 

[Micah Sweet]

Speak for yourself, not for others, please.

Fair enough. In My Opinion, you roleplay emotions if you want to keep it simulative.

 

[zakael19]

The question was not posed to be specifically about non-players, so I included the IF it had armor...

Fair enough, the original context of the damage discussion was regarding adversaries so I figured we were on that still.

Hell, an Unstoppable Guardian is going to take 0 HP from a large variety of incoming attacks...

... almost like they're Unstoppable...

 

[Tigris]

The question was not posed to be specifically about non-players, so I included the IF it had armor...

It was literally a discussion about players doing tag teams against enemies vs normal attacks.

 

[Umbran]

If I'm off-base, perhaps you can explain.

It isn't really the subject of the thread, so I'm not sure it would be appropriate for more than the passing comments I've already made.

Or at least be a little less dismissive of an honest thought.

I wrote several paragraphs of response to this, realized they were even more off-topic, and deleted them.

I will leave it with saying that these days I question the honesty behind the rhetorical form presented here, and leave it at that.

 

[Umbran]

It was literally a discussion about players doing tag teams against enemies vs normal attacks.

I quote:

All attacks that land do at least 1 damage by default no?

So, it was literally and explicitly a question about all attacks, not just that one case. My answer was to the question asked, including a conditional that handles the element you seem to have taken exception to.

From my point of view, you're getting in my face over nothing. Please stop.