I mean 5e spear vs quarterstaff is also utmost broken. How can a weapon deal more damage without the pointy end than with? (I am refering to the shenanigan that you obviously could use a quarterstaff onehanded (How to do this other than a sa walking stick evades me, i bet this is just to recreate a stupid Gandalf staff and sword cameo), but on top of that use polearm mastery in conjunction with a shield.
A spear should do 1d10 twohanded and 1d8 onehanded, or the quarterstaff should do 1d6 1d4 accordingly and not be compliant with polearm master at least not onehanded.
A Quarterstaff is a deadly weapon, in the hand of a specialist like a ninja master or such, but in the hand of an untrained person like a wizard it should never be able to dish out more damage than a spear, the weapon used most commonly for untrained peoples militia, they would have handed out staffs, they are cheaper also.
A spear should do 1d10 twohanded and 1d8 onehanded, or the quarterstaff should do 1d6 1d4 accordingly and not be compliant with polearm master at least not onehanded.
A Quarterstaff is a deadly weapon, in the hand of a specialist like a ninja master or such, but in the hand of an untrained person like a wizard it should never be able to dish out more damage than a spear, the weapon used most commonly for untrained peoples militia, they would have handed out staffs, they are cheaper also.







