Celebrim
Legend
Because it often is - but it does require the recipient to not be too hung up on the details, and instead look at the general form.
No two readers will agree to the general form or what is relevant. That's a failure of empathy to assume that an analogy obvious to you would be obvious to all. What you call "hung up on the details" is just someone looking at it from a different angle than you were looking at it.
A one-to-one relationship is hardly required in this case.
Of course it is, otherwise the analogy adds confusion rather than clarity. My relationship to my spouse isn't the same as my relationship to a rules set.
It wasn't intended to.
I think most readers did, or will, get my point.
That you poisoned the well by introducing a false analogy? Maybe.
My apologies if it is opaque to you, but it wasn't written for you, personally.
It wasn't written for who you were responding to either.
Your post would have been clearer if you just responded with the relevant critique:
""The rules are too <foo> when someone playing it is not enjoying it," is non-diagnostic, though. And it also fails to admit to problems arising from anything other than rules."
Only that critique is itself uncharitable. Yes, his observation is pretty trite so far as it goes, but it never claimed to be diagnostic. And the last sentence is nakedly wrong on the face of it, since he said "You can change "light" to any other descriptive word, too.", so objectively he did admit to problems arising from things other than rules.







