And none of my falsehoods was as extreme as yours claiming "studies showed people learn better with reading books", when the study is about
reading comprehension depending on
leasure time reading which is far far far away from your statement.
Also reading comprehension was tested with the PISA test (at least in the first study cited), which uses static texts for testing...
https://www.oecd.org/en/about/programmes/pisa/pisa-test.html
Yes some of these texts do look a bit like really old static websites, but its still static text. Its not even chat on a mobile phone with scroll, or subtitles in 4x speed to japanese cartoons.
And again, its just reading comprehension (and that only for static text), no tests of video comprehension, audio comprehension, game comprehension, short video comprehension etc.
Well how do professionals in jobs in companies who have time stress get information, via books or digital? I think this alone answers clearly what is more efficient.