Wizards of the Coast employees responsible for Magic: Arena unionize [UPDATED]

Wizards has until the end of the week to voluntarily recognize the union.
1777306705270.png


A supermajority of game developers behind Magic: The Gathering Arena have announced their intent to form a union with the Communications Workers of America. The CWA announced their plans today, citing a need to protect workers from layoffs, guardrails over generative AI usage and crunch time, and protections for remote work. Workers have asked Wizards of the Coast to voluntarily recognize their union, with a deadline of the end of the week. The union appears to be limited to just Magic: The Gathering Arena developers and not developers of either the physical Magic: The Gathering product, the D&D design team, or the developers of D&D Beyond. Wizards of the Coast laid off almost the entire team behind Project Sigil, a digital D&D VTT, back in 2025.

While not connected to Wizards' tabletop space, this marks a continued effort by the CWA to unionize within the game space. The CWA also helped found a union at Paizo back in 2023. The CWA has cited that 4,000 workers across various game studios have unionized over the past several years.

UPDATE 29 April 2026--WotC has responded to the unionization announcement:

We have received the filing and are reviewing it carefully. Our employees are the lifeblood of what makes us great, and we are committed to fostering a workplace where every person feels heard, valued, and supported. We believe we have a strong connection with everyone at Wizards of the Coast and that direct relationship with our employees is essential to how we work together to capture the imagination of our fans and players, inspiring a lifetime love of our games. We appreciate hearing about the needs and interests of our employees through this filing, and will respond through the appropriate process.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer

Management Handbook: It's only illegal if you get caught
Think About It GIF by Identity
Having listened to plenty of people who went to court in Washington over similar things, you'd probably be surprised how many bosses will blatantly say they fired people for a blatantly illegal reason rather than just keep their mouth shut. As an example, my roommate got fired by having the boss chase them out of the business while throwing heavy objects at them and screaming "...and don't come back!" The boss later denied unemployment saying my roommate had quit after they had drawn months of unemployment. Went to court and unsurprisingly, this was the sort of guy that lots of people, former workers and customers, begged to be able to testify against in a court of law. After many witnesses and stories of illegal behavior, the boss gets on the stand, the judge asks "did you do all these (illegal) things?" Guy goes, "Ya, I did them! I can do them. I'm the boss!" Needless to say, he was found to have a hostile workplace, have fired my roommate, and my roommate did not have to pay back the unemployment.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

This is a tradeoff I would definitely take.
It's been a good change! We were five days a week many years ago and around 2020 we tried four days week. The literature suggest that the amount of productivity is relatively equal. For obvious reasons, we went remote during the pandemic. Since then we're in-person at the office, but we do allow some flexibility for work-from-home.
 

Having listened to plenty of people who went to court in Washington over similar things, you'd probably be surprised how many bosses will blatantly say they fired people for a blatantly illegal reason rather than just keep their mouth shut. As an example, my roommate got fired by having the boss chase them out of the business while throwing heavy objects at them and screaming "...and don't come back!" The boss later denied unemployment saying my roommate had quit after they had drawn months of unemployment. Went to court and unsurprisingly, this was the sort of guy that lots of people, former workers and customers, begged to be able to testify against in a court of law. After many witnesses and stories of illegal behavior, the boss gets on the stand, the judge asks "did you do all these (illegal) things?" Guy goes, "Ya, I did them! I can do them. I'm the boss!" Needless to say, he was found to have a hostile workplace, have fired my roommate, and my roommate did not have to pay back the unemployment.
Oh yeah, they actually tend to be real bad at the getting away with it part,
 

Folks should be aware that the story continues over here:

 

Fiduciary duty does not require abandoning ethics.
To provide additional support for your point, at least in the US, this went up to the Supreme Court.

In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, the Court famously rejected the idea that a corporation's only goal is to maximize profit. Justice Alito wrote that "modern corporate law does not require for-profit corporations to pursue profit at the expense of everything else,"
 


Does not require...
Does not preclude either.
Absolutely. Since the point that was being put forth was that Hasbro had a duty to publish Harry Potter, the fact that is is not actually required by law shows that Hasbro actually has the option to, not a fiduciary requirement.

This was against someone effectively saying Hasbro's fiduciary duty was absolute, when it's not. It shows exactly what it needs to show.
 

Absolutely. Since the point that was being put forth was that Hasbro had a duty to publish Harry Potter, the fact that is is not actually required by law shows that Hasbro actually has the option to, not a fiduciary requirement.

This was against someone effectively saying Hasbro's fiduciary duty was absolute, when it's not. It shows exactly what it needs to show.

That's a good point.

A lot of the choices have been consciously made without compulsory service.
 

Having listened to plenty of people who went to court in Washington over similar things, you'd probably be surprised how many bosses will blatantly say they fired people for a blatantly illegal reason rather than just keep their mouth shut. As an example, my roommate got fired by having the boss chase them out of the business while throwing heavy objects at them and screaming "...and don't come back!" The boss later denied unemployment saying my roommate had quit after they had drawn months of unemployment. Went to court and unsurprisingly, this was the sort of guy that lots of people, former workers and customers, begged to be able to testify against in a court of law. After many witnesses and stories of illegal behavior, the boss gets on the stand, the judge asks "did you do all these (illegal) things?" Guy goes, "Ya, I did them! I can do them. I'm the boss!" Needless to say, he was found to have a hostile workplace, have fired my roommate, and my roommate did not have to pay back the unemployment.
It's weird how when some people get a taste of authority they go on a power trip and turn into little dictators.
 

Oh yeah, they actually tend to be real bad at the getting away with it part,
Actually, the get away with it pretty well. Take them to court and you'll probably win, but at best it seems that that means that they'll have to do what they legally had to do anyway without repercussion or perhaps you'll get a trifle of a settlement in case of illegal firing.
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top