Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
World's Largest Dungeon XP points problem: Region A (Spoiler Free)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Qwillion" data-source="post: 2199453" data-attributes="member: 14641"><p>BILLD91 </p><p>“I think you're being a bit anal about the experience point issue, especially since the WLD recommends that you not use the standard XP award rules at all. Rather, they think you're better off letting the players play a while and then leveling them up when it seems appropriate.” </p><p></p><p></p><p>I think your being ignorant. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>You have not read the book. The book recommends awarding ½ Xp by challenge rating or awarding XP by encounter level. The idea of letting the players play a while and then leveling them up came from the ENWORLD MESSAGE BOARD, not the book. Those Ideas from the board came when those players realized AEGs guidelines were flat wrong, my disgust comes from the fact that this is supposed to be a professional product. It is unprofessional to charge for a product and then for the product not to operate according the guidelines of the product. I would have had no problem if the XP had worked within their guidelines.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“As far as the other 'lazy' elements of the intro, I don't consider them lazy at all. Rather, I see them as realistic assessments of what the module isn't built to accommodate: druids, summoning, and wizards.”</p><p></p><p>It was lazy not too build the WLD to accommodate the core classes</p><p></p><p>You do not ban the use of abilities; you require their use. You design certain encounters so that certain encounters do not do well against a particular class, allowing that character to shine.</p><p></p><p>Lazy adventure design: We don’t like X about the d20 system so lets ban it, it’s too tough to make it balanced or even function in the world’s largest dungeon. </p><p></p><p>Industrious adventure design: We require encounters in the WLD that are easier or harder if you summon, have a druid, have a wizard, have teleport, have etherealness, have planeshift, </p><p></p><p>Example: we do not like summoning because it allows players to have a trap dummy </p><p>Solution 1: Ban summoning</p><p>Solution 2: the trap triggers when the fourth person passes through the door. </p><p>Solution 3: This trap takes control of any summoned creature in a 100’ radius and has them attack their master. </p><p></p><p> </p><p> “At least they took the time to let the DM know this up front.”</p><p></p><p>Yes. They told how lazy they were and why they were lazy. </p><p></p><p></p><p>THE AULD GRUMP</p><p>“Ack! You mean he wasn't exaggerating?!! Gah!”</p><p></p><p>Yes but again that is just the introduction, the rest of the book is quite enjoyable, region A is the weakest I have read so far and that is only because it was limited to the specific monsters it uses. </p><p></p><p>This book has a number of amazing features, its encounters and the layouts of these encounters. The fact that not every encounter wants to kill you. Monsters function at the proper intelligence level, every room of this massive complex is detailed, the encounter conditions (situational modifiers for each encounter) are a fascinating and wonderful edition. Icould go on. Like I said I will buy the World's Largest City, that's how much I liked it, but the Xp flaw is just really frustrating. </p><p></p><p>“I lost interest when the book mentioned that Bardic Knowledge revealed nothing, but it sounds like very little was done in regards to a lot of other character classes as well.”</p><p></p><p>I had issue with this one as well, the intro states no one has been here in 5,000 years, but just sitting here I can think of three sources of knowledge, though the DCs would have been high, </p><p>All the prisoners of the dungeon that escaped certainly would brag about their escape.</p><p>Underdark creatures that moved in, who later moved out. </p><p>A rather insane wizard who seems to have left the dungeon would have told rather bizarre stories. </p><p></p><p>I think that you could have saved all the banning space and put in things you could discover with bardic knowledge.</p><p></p><p>I do not have a bard in my party; I have an akashic so he is slowly learning all the back-story of the dungeon, which is extremely good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Qwillion, post: 2199453, member: 14641"] BILLD91 “I think you're being a bit anal about the experience point issue, especially since the WLD recommends that you not use the standard XP award rules at all. Rather, they think you're better off letting the players play a while and then leveling them up when it seems appropriate.” I think your being ignorant. :) You have not read the book. The book recommends awarding ½ Xp by challenge rating or awarding XP by encounter level. The idea of letting the players play a while and then leveling them up came from the ENWORLD MESSAGE BOARD, not the book. Those Ideas from the board came when those players realized AEGs guidelines were flat wrong, my disgust comes from the fact that this is supposed to be a professional product. It is unprofessional to charge for a product and then for the product not to operate according the guidelines of the product. I would have had no problem if the XP had worked within their guidelines. “As far as the other 'lazy' elements of the intro, I don't consider them lazy at all. Rather, I see them as realistic assessments of what the module isn't built to accommodate: druids, summoning, and wizards.” It was lazy not too build the WLD to accommodate the core classes You do not ban the use of abilities; you require their use. You design certain encounters so that certain encounters do not do well against a particular class, allowing that character to shine. Lazy adventure design: We don’t like X about the d20 system so lets ban it, it’s too tough to make it balanced or even function in the world’s largest dungeon. Industrious adventure design: We require encounters in the WLD that are easier or harder if you summon, have a druid, have a wizard, have teleport, have etherealness, have planeshift, Example: we do not like summoning because it allows players to have a trap dummy Solution 1: Ban summoning Solution 2: the trap triggers when the fourth person passes through the door. Solution 3: This trap takes control of any summoned creature in a 100’ radius and has them attack their master. “At least they took the time to let the DM know this up front.” Yes. They told how lazy they were and why they were lazy. THE AULD GRUMP “Ack! You mean he wasn't exaggerating?!! Gah!” Yes but again that is just the introduction, the rest of the book is quite enjoyable, region A is the weakest I have read so far and that is only because it was limited to the specific monsters it uses. This book has a number of amazing features, its encounters and the layouts of these encounters. The fact that not every encounter wants to kill you. Monsters function at the proper intelligence level, every room of this massive complex is detailed, the encounter conditions (situational modifiers for each encounter) are a fascinating and wonderful edition. Icould go on. Like I said I will buy the World's Largest City, that's how much I liked it, but the Xp flaw is just really frustrating. “I lost interest when the book mentioned that Bardic Knowledge revealed nothing, but it sounds like very little was done in regards to a lot of other character classes as well.” I had issue with this one as well, the intro states no one has been here in 5,000 years, but just sitting here I can think of three sources of knowledge, though the DCs would have been high, All the prisoners of the dungeon that escaped certainly would brag about their escape. Underdark creatures that moved in, who later moved out. A rather insane wizard who seems to have left the dungeon would have told rather bizarre stories. I think that you could have saved all the banning space and put in things you could discover with bardic knowledge. I do not have a bard in my party; I have an akashic so he is slowly learning all the back-story of the dungeon, which is extremely good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
World's Largest Dungeon XP points problem: Region A (Spoiler Free)
Top