Larry Hunsaker
First Post
Given the fact that feats have some strange ability score requirements which often require some long term planning, in case you blow it and miss qualifying for one this option would help. It basically avoids the min/max possibility but allows enough versatility to be useful, so you need not worry that when some new feat comes out you have no chance to qualify for it.
Basically, the system would work like so:
Each level you get a free re-training (in addition to the normal one or you could say it uses up the normal one) and can reduce 1 ability score by 1 point to raise another ability score of lower value by 1 point. You make the comparison of the two scores to determine if a score is of lower value than the other before you make the re-training changes to them.
This will not allow you to reduce a lower score to boost a higher one which would be broken very quickly, but it can let you raise up inferior scores at the expense of better scores. This way you can boost a low score to meet the feat requirement you did not plan on meeting but it will cost you in other areas.
What do you think, any suggestions?
Larry
Basically, the system would work like so:
Each level you get a free re-training (in addition to the normal one or you could say it uses up the normal one) and can reduce 1 ability score by 1 point to raise another ability score of lower value by 1 point. You make the comparison of the two scores to determine if a score is of lower value than the other before you make the re-training changes to them.
This will not allow you to reduce a lower score to boost a higher one which would be broken very quickly, but it can let you raise up inferior scores at the expense of better scores. This way you can boost a low score to meet the feat requirement you did not plan on meeting but it will cost you in other areas.
What do you think, any suggestions?
Larry