General RPG DiscussionDiscussion of all RPGs and non-system-specific topics. DM/GM/player issues, settings, etc. Rules discussion belongs in one the forums below.
A question for you Morrus, since you're in this thread and it has tangentially come up. How do you feel about the lack of a web site license for 4e material?
This is a news and discussion site, very comfortably within fair use. We can talk about D&D all we like. Hell, it would suck for WotC if nobody was allowed to talk about their game!
Quote:
I might have missed it, but I don't see anything in the 4e GSL allowing for your hosting on this site material which has elements contained in the 4e SRD.
I have a good relationship with Scott, et al. Any issues can be resolved amicably and quickly. I don't anticipate any problems, and I'm fairly sure they don't either.
you just having an opinion you plucked out of the air
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morrus
I have no idea what that means or how it relates to my post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joethelawyer
he lost me too...
That is how it relates. IF I did have data showing that I wrote something and sold or gave it to people and it increased the sales of D&D, or in my hypothetical AD&D, then without permission to write and give it away, I could not present any data and it would be seen as:
"just having an opinion you plucked out of the air"
That is how it relates. IF I did have data showing that I wrote something and sold or gave it to people and it increased the sales of D&D, or in my hypothetical AD&D, then without permission to write and give it away, I could not present any data and it would be seen as:
"just having an opinion you plucked out of the air"
and also not allowed to be said on this forum.
dude, i'm still lost...maybe its the sudafed, nasal spray, and the cough syrup pumping through my system, but i am missing the point you are tyying to make...
__________________ ~Joe
If you like what I said, throw me some XP. I was a goblin sharpshooter for far too long.
God forbid they save on marketing the PHB or DMG because I was able to make something that caused people to need to buy it and WotC didn't have to shell out any extra money for that advertising. How much do TV commercials cost these days? Not just the 30 seconds of time, but production as well.
So what I am offering is less marketing costs and accounts payable for WotC, with an increase in accounts receivable and sales due to the increased interest in the product for D&D that only they can make and sell.
Wow. You must think really highly of your so called "product". Your post implies that you believe a non-4e gamer will happen upon your book/program/product, read it and say, "OMG, I was never going to before, but now I want to buy the 4e PHB from WOTC, because this third party product is so awesome!!"
Do you really believe that you have a product in mind that you think will single-handedly generate enough sales of PHBs and other core books that WOTC would rush to get the GSL done with the proper edits to give you the access you need?
Do you have a product at all? I mean, are you a publisher, or a have aspirations to be a publisher (that can perform the kind of sales magic for WOTC that you claim?)
__________________ Game on, gang! Ptolus #16 (with customized, personalized sig from Monte. Awesomesauce.), Rappan Athuk Reloaded #37 (Another Awesomesauce, the Necromancer way.)
Characters & Games
Books currently in play: Dungeon & Dragon Magazine (*Scales of War AP*), WOTC 4e Core and Supplemental books
Current Campaign: Scales of War - Siege of Bordrin's Watch -- Kodirgo, Minotaur Barbarian 5; Vondal, Dwarf Cleric 5; [Dead]Vintani Windleaf, Eladrin Swordmage 5[/Dead] - TBD; Marshaun, Elf Druid 5
That is how it relates. IF I did have data showing that I wrote something and sold or gave it to people and it increased the sales of D&D, or in my hypothetical AD&D, then without permission to write and give it away, I could not present any data and it would be seen as:
"just having an opinion you plucked out of the air"
and also not allowed to be said on this forum.
Sure you could. If I am not mistaken, you can use OSRIC to publish an AD&D compatible module or product, can't you? And I know nothing of OSRIC (or OSRIC 2.0).
__________________ Game on, gang! Ptolus #16 (with customized, personalized sig from Monte. Awesomesauce.), Rappan Athuk Reloaded #37 (Another Awesomesauce, the Necromancer way.)
Characters & Games
Books currently in play: Dungeon & Dragon Magazine (*Scales of War AP*), WOTC 4e Core and Supplemental books
Current Campaign: Scales of War - Siege of Bordrin's Watch -- Kodirgo, Minotaur Barbarian 5; Vondal, Dwarf Cleric 5; [Dead]Vintani Windleaf, Eladrin Swordmage 5[/Dead] - TBD; Marshaun, Elf Druid 5
dude, i'm still lost...maybe its the sudafed, nasal spray, and the cough syrup pumping through my system, but i am missing the point you are tyying to make...
Morrus said this:
WotC has data
I have opinion
WotC values its data over my opinion.
IF I had data to show I would have no way to present it just to prove mine was not an opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsclaw227
Do you have a product at all? I mean, are you a publisher, or a have aspirations to be a publisher (that can perform the kind of sales magic for WOTC that you claim?)
I have something homebrew that, should I choose to, could be converted to 4th edition.
I have a printer and have done small print jobs for businesses before, but also can make PDFs.
And people call me a skeptic!
What could a non-porn* product I make do to harm WotC or 4th anymore than the word of mouth and 4th edition itself has done to harm it?
I don't buy porn, nor want it in my D&D so still don't know much about the BoEF.
Last edited by justanobody; 29th November 2008 at 05:31 AM..
That is how it relates. IF I did have data showing that I wrote something and sold or gave it to people and it increased the sales of D&D, or in my hypothetical AD&D, then without permission to write and give it away, I could not present any data and it would be seen as:
"just having an opinion you plucked out of the air"
and also not allowed to be said on this forum.
I do not beleive any data could exist - you would need access to TSR's (then) sales records and a comprehensive statistical analysis which proved a correlation between your effort and their sales; and that said correlation was statistically significant (i.e. proving that two of your mates bought something becaus eof it is irrelevant). It would be a very complex and detailed proof.
Furthermore, even in you did have such details, you would need vastly wider statistics to provide evidence that it was anything more than a statistical aberration in that one case.
On the plus side, I do believe that you believe that.
I hereby give you permission to post, here on EN World, any such proof without moderator recrimination. Feel free to provide this data.
I have something homebrew that, should I choose to, could be converted to 4th edition.
I have a printer and have done small print jobs for businesses before, but also can make PDFs.
Honestly, no offense, but this alone isn't enough to convince WOTC to alter their GSL to meet the needs you are expressing. If Clark at Necromancer Games can't get the changes done in time, I am not sure if justanobody can do it, unless you are a well credentialed, highly influential member of the RPG publishing community and you are just being modest.
__________________ Game on, gang! Ptolus #16 (with customized, personalized sig from Monte. Awesomesauce.), Rappan Athuk Reloaded #37 (Another Awesomesauce, the Necromancer way.)
Characters & Games
Books currently in play: Dungeon & Dragon Magazine (*Scales of War AP*), WOTC 4e Core and Supplemental books
Current Campaign: Scales of War - Siege of Bordrin's Watch -- Kodirgo, Minotaur Barbarian 5; Vondal, Dwarf Cleric 5; [Dead]Vintani Windleaf, Eladrin Swordmage 5[/Dead] - TBD; Marshaun, Elf Druid 5
This is a news and discussion site, very comfortably within fair use. We can talk about D&D all we like. Hell, it would suck for WotC if nobody was allowed to talk about their game!
I have a good relationship with Scott, et al. Any issues can be resolved amicably and quickly. I don't anticipate any problems, and I'm fairly sure they don't either.
Talking about it is not what i was getting at. I know we've come a long way from the bad old days, when T$R forced sites to be closed down all over the Internet if they had some high school kid's character, or home made monster or module on it.
As a lawyer, and a guy who saw people burned before on this issue, I look at the worst case scenario. As it stands now, it could happen all over again with 4e material, the new GSL, and lack of a license granting certain rights for the hosting of game materials for gamers' own personal use.
Even though I don't play or like 4e, I don't want to see that happen to other gamers. Then again, maybe I should hope that it does happen. The natural outcome would be for more people to go to Pathfinder or other non-4e materials. I don't think they'd be that stupid though...
__________________ ~Joe
If you like what I said, throw me some XP. I was a goblin sharpshooter for far too long.
Sure you could. If I am not mistaken, you can use OSRIC to publish an AD&D compatible module or product, can't you? And I know nothing of OSRIC (or OSRIC 2.0).
If it was done when ORSIC existed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morrus
I do not beleive any data could exist - you would need access to TSR's (then) sales records and a comprehensive statistical analysis which proved a correlation between your effort and their sales; and that said correlation was statistically significant (i.e. proving that two of your mates bought something becaus eof it is irrelevant). It would be a very complex and detailed proof.
Furthermore, even in you did have such details, you would need vastly wider statistics to provide evidence that it was anything more than a statistical aberration in that one case.
On the plus side, I do believe that you believe that.
I hereby give you permission to post, here on EN World, any such proof without moderator recrimination. Feel free to provide this data.
As I said it was hypothetical. The point still remains that the data would undergo so much scrutiny that it is likely to be thrown out.
I did write a plot hook and sell it in the past for a quarter a copy for the copy machine and it sold 4 extra PHBs at a LGS, but that is not the kind of thing I am talking about. One page printouts that sale a book are flukes, and that is likely any other data I had such that would be from LGS would be seen as or so infinitesimal as to be negligent.
But to actually have the adventure I have been working on for some time that people have tried to pay me for has been on hold indefinately because I have no legal right to even use the names of some of the things in it, and must remain my own homebrew until that time that I CAN use those names held by TSR....erm WotC now. So even the adventure is incomplete to prevent me from doing anything with it.
Why? Because I cannot afford some lawyer should someone decide a single word I used was out of place because my elves do no function exactly like those presented in a core book, but that is the only change or addition to races.
So how would the data be presented, or should I try to finish the adventure under OSRIC as catclaw suggests and then see IF WotC wants to grant some special license to adapt to 4th using my elves.
$1,000,000 bets Scott would refuse me a special license for a single adventure as I am just one random person, and IF Wotc wanted it under 4th, they would buy it as freelance, and then own it.
Again wish I knew where that podcast of the 3PP and WotC meeting went on my HDD to review it in regards to the new license that came to be known as the GSL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsclaw227
Honestly, no offense, but this alone isn't enough to convince WOTC to alter their GSL to meet the needs you are expressing. If Clark at Necromancer Games can't get the changes done in time, I am not sure if justanobody can do it, unless you are a well credentialed, highly influential member of the RPG publishing community and you are just being modest.
That is pretty much my point in a nutshell, and I am as my username suggests...just a nobody.
My gripe with the GSL is just that. My gripe. If I were to publish I would want that option to change elves the way I want, and otherwise would prefer to have 3PP be able to do the same if they have some world or setting idea that warrants a change to what an elf is.
Talking about it is not what i was getting at. I know we've come a long way from the bad old days, when T forced sites to be closed down all over the Internet if they had some high school kid's character, or home made monster or module on it.
As a lawyer, and a guy who saw people burned before on this issue, I look at the worst case scenario. As it stands now, it could happen all over again with 4e material, the new GSL, and lack of a license granting certain rights for the hosting of game materials for gamers' own personal use.
Even though I don't play or like 4e, I don't want to see that happen to other gamers. Then again, maybe I should hope that it does happen. The natural outcome would be for more people to go to Pathfinder or other non-4e materials. I don't think they'd be that stupid though...
Like I said, I have a good relationship with WotC and work with them in good faith. If an issue arose, it would be resolved amicably.
Honestly, don't worry. It's all good. WotC is very friendly.
IIRC, that book was the impetus for putting the objectionable material clause in the STL? Am I right?
I believe you are correct; it was originally going to be released under the d20 STL, but WoTC changed it, forcing them to go the OGL route.
__________________ Veronica: Where's your brother?
Dick: I think he took Ghost World up to his room. They're probably up there making love. Or playing Dungeons and Dragons. Or both, at the same time. They're both, like, 12th-level dorks. I'm just sayin'
My gripe with the GSL is just that. My gripe. If I were to publish I would want that option to change elves the way I want, and otherwise would prefer to have 3PP be able to do the same if they have some world or setting idea that warrants a change to what an elf is.
so all this anger comes from the fact that you don't want to publish your module under the 4e GSL?
Put it out under the OGL or for Pathfinder, or some other system. Or make it generic enough that it fits in under any gaming system. If its a good enough module, people will convert it.
__________________ ~Joe
If you like what I said, throw me some XP. I was a goblin sharpshooter for far too long.
Quote:
Originally Posted by justanobody What could a non-porn* product I make do to harm WotC or 4th anymore than the word of mouth and 4th edition itself has done to harm it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fifth Element
Yeah. Don't even know where to start with that one.
I was about to take another hit of cough medicine to help me figure it out...
__________________ ~Joe
If you like what I said, throw me some XP. I was a goblin sharpshooter for far too long.
Yes, I figured that. So that's that whole line of conversation over; let's drop that, as we should have done several posts ago.
Quote:
But to actually have the adventure I have been working on for some time that people have tried to pay me for has been on hold indefinately because I have no legal right to even use the names of some of the things in it, and must remain my own homebrew until that time that I CAN use those names held by TSR....erm WotC now. So even the adventure is incomplete to prevent me from doing anything with it.
That adventure that only has value because WotC spent millions of dollars developing a product, a system, and a brand?
WotC is not a charity. Why should you be able to profit from their work? From their HUGE investment?
I wouldn't like it if you opened "enworld.net", and copied my efforts and used my brand name to do so.
Do you believe you should be able to sell a software package billed as "Windows 2009"? Build a car and produce it as a "BMW M8"?
I really don't get your point here. If you want to use WotC brand name, accept the conditions under which they generously allow you to (believe me, Microsoft wouldn't allow you to do that; neither would Sony allow you to release a Tomb Raider game; MGM would be very annoyed if you tried to produce a new Bond movie; the BBC would not allow you to publish a Doctor Who novel).
If you don't agree to those conditions, don't use the brand name. It's that simple. Why do you feel you have any right to the D&D brand name? How much money have you invested in it? If you want rights to it, start buying shares in Hasbro - buy enough, and it's yours.
Do you honestly not understand the concept and value of a brand? The vast resources that go into making it a worldwide name? The need to protect that incredibly valuable asset at all costs?
That brand name, "Dungeons & Dragons", is the most valuable thing that WotC owns. What's the most valuable thing you own? Your house? Your car? Is it OK if Scott Rouse comes and borrows it for a week? After all, he's spent ages working out how he want to redecorate your bedroom. How dare you not let him do it? He's got a great idea - pink walls, disco lights and a constant WWII air raid alarm going off at the head of the bed.
__________________
Last edited by Morrus; 29th November 2008 at 06:06 AM..
so all this anger comes from the fact that you don't want to publish your module under the 4e GSL?
Put it out under the OGL or for Pathfinder, or some other system. Or make it generic enough that it fits in under any gaming system. If its a good enough module, people will convert it.
I am trying to forget 3rd edition ever existed thanks.
Quote:
That adventure that only has value because WotC spent millions of dollars developing a product, a system, and a brand?
No it has value because the monsters and NPCs used in the story are crucial to them. Rather the story has a much greater value because of the monsters and NPCs created by TSR (Gary/Mentzer).
Do you honestly not understand the concept and value of a brand? The vast resources that go into making it a worldwide name? The need to protect that incredibly valuable asset at all costs?
That brand name, "Dungeons & Dragons", is the most valuable thing that WotC owns.
He ought to go read a book by Nomi Klein called "No Logo." The power of branding would hit home like a brick to the head.
__________________ ~Joe
If you like what I said, throw me some XP. I was a goblin sharpshooter for far too long.
Linear Mode
And yet another word from our sponsors
