Recent News | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Visit Our Sponsors | | | | Subscribe! | | | | EN World: Your Daily RPG Magazine | | All the latest EN World
official reviews, columns, and subscriber articles here.
Don't have your subscription yet? It's only $3 a month and you can grab
it right
here! |
6th April 2009, 11:16 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
| |
Walking the Nine Worlds
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Burke
Posts: 17,100
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Umbran But, that's not what is happening here. There nothing "invalidated" about your previously bought stuff. You paid for some data, and got that data, and still have that data. They aren't taking it back. Keep backups like you ought to, and you should have no problems.
Invalidating your contract with RPGNow for re-downloads is another issue. However, it seems like RPGNow didn't actually have the right to guarantee such access to begin with. You want to hold WotC responsible for agreements they were not party to? You think that's reasonable? | We don't know if WotC negotiated a contract allowing them to pull the availability of files for redownload in contradiction of the terms that RPGNOW advertises it sells pdfs on. We do know their authorized seller of pdfs said we could redownload the WotC products and now according to the statement WotC has told them not to allow that to happen after sales have been made.
We don't know if RPGNow made claims it was not authorized to make or if WotC ordered something it does not have the legal authority to order. Even if WotC has legal authority to pull back their download sources, it is their action that takes away stuff we paid for.
You expect consumers to give WotC the benefit of the doubt and to turn the other cheek.
We paid for data and access to data. We now just have the data we downloaded but not the access to store backups that we paid for. We do not know enough to say if they are legally entitled to take away access to the store backups from their consumers. They might be. This would not entitle them to say it is not their actions that are responsible for the consumers loss or to avoid the ire their actions cause. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:17 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,773
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jdrakeh That said, as I mention earlier, this sounds far more like the GW push to 'help' brick and mortar stores by forcing Internet retailers to adhere to slavish, often absurd, standards in order to carry GW stock at all. | Do you have any reason to think this?
I'm not saying that you're wrong, because I don't know what's going on. But do you have any particular reason for thinking this particular scenario is occuring? |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:17 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
| |
Chooses endarkenment over enlightenment
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,043
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tmatk I bet you're right, but this move will have no effect. In fact, I bet it increases the amount of books that are pirated; harder to feel bad about downloading a book via bittorrent if their is no way to buy it. | 100% Agree. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:18 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: El Reno, Okla
Posts: 1,055
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Lizard Uhm... I just checked out Drivethru and RPGNow, and I can buy WOTC products, still.
When does this go into effect?
(I got as far as checkout, I didn't actually try to buy anything, but if you can add them to your cart, I don't see why you can't buy...) | I tried to re-download a previously purchased WotC book and you don't see anything till you try to download.
The Download window repeats what is said on the main page.
I don't understand their thinking with pdf products.
They never use them to support their own products.
The GSL forces 3rd party publishers to remove their old ones making torrents the ONLY version available.
And now even if they start selling them themselves, many people won't trust them since they just forced RPGNow! to break their contract with their customers. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:21 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
| |
...is hunting Zhents in the Border Forrest. :-)
Muad'dib of the Anauroch
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Over the hills and far away. (live in Florida, Home is Michigan)
Posts: 4,318
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Stalker0 Thing is, if you make it harder to get illegal copies of a pdf on the net, more people are likely to legitimately buy them.
Its the old expression, "why buy the cow when I can get the milk for free". Well the flip side works as well, "If I like milk, and can't get the milk for free, maybe I'll buy a cow".
People get illegal pdfs because its free and easy to do. If the easy to do is taken out, then that's more incentive to just cough up some cash and get the pdf legally. | I believe they can make it harder for sites to offer illegal downloads, but to actually make it harder for people to find and download? In the end, I'd highly doubt it. Trying to stop pirating in it's entirety is probably an exercise akin to the Little Dutch Boy with his finger in the dike.
But, I do ascribe to the idea that people essentially want to do the right thing (for the most part). If you provide a product at a reasonable price, and then pro-actively and accurately communicate with your customers, I believe that most people will buy a legitimate copy rather than pirate.
Becuase of their PR ineptness, I also believe that the majority of WoTC's problems on this front are self-inflicted. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:24 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
| |
Expect to feel pleasure. Knowledge is sexy. Expect
to feel pain. Knowledge is torture.
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Berlin NJ
Posts: 7,108
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jdrakeh Yes, they do, actually. Or, at the very least, Minion Development/ RPGNow did prior to the merger with DriveThru to become OBS. I assume that it is still part of the company.
That said, as I mention earlier, this sounds far more like the GW push to 'help' brick and mortar stores by forcing Internet retailers to adhere to slavish, often absurd, standards in order to carry GW stock at all.
Then, after they effectively locked out most online distributors, they turned their sights on those brick and mortar stores they were previously trying to 'help' by forcing them to adhere to the same (or similar) standards. | Uhh... did you read their authorized online seller stuff? There aren't any slavish or absurd standards aside from pretty much always maintaining your brick and morter store. Quote: |
Except that they were not going exclusively through OBS — they were (and apparently are) still going through Paizo. And there are other PDF distributors that they could go through, to boot.
| Yeah but the current edition stuff is well was drivethru exclusive. Quote: |
I think it's far more likely that they're trying to 'help' brick and mortar stores by crippling online vendors, a plan which is both far cheaper and easier to implement (and, again, which GW has proved works to the manufacturer's advantage with regard to IP control).
| They already had that stuff in place before, (about Brick and Morter) just through the distributor. Did you read any of the retailer rewards stuff linked to the press release? |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:28 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
| |
Walking the Nine Worlds
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Burke
Posts: 17,100
| I wish I had immediately bought the white box pdfs and 1e Manual of the Planes, two WotC pdfs not for sale on Paizo. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:32 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,773
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Voadam You expect consumers to give WotC the benefit of the doubt and to turn the other cheek. | You're giving RPGNow the benefit of the doubt. In a situation where its almost guaranteed that they knew, when they promised you future downloads, that they couldn't actually guarantee that promise.
Why the hard line: Quote: |
We do not know enough to say if they are legally entitled to take away access to the store backups from their consumers. They might be. This would not entitle them to say it is not their actions that are responsible for the consumers loss or to avoid the ire their actions cause.
| for one company but not the other? Particularly when only one of the companies has made promises to you? |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:32 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
| |
knows
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Revere, MA
Posts: 4,538
| That's seriously not cool. If I'd bought any WotC PDFs from RPGNow, I'd be making a huge stink right now.
One of the main reasons I like buying from them is that you can download your PDFs later. RPGNow should have required that in any contract before allowing WotC to sell on their store, so either RPGNow was negligent on that requirement or WotC broke a contract. Either way, someone     ed up, and if I was one of the consumers who had purchased any of their stuff I'd be demanding my money back. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:33 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
| |
has no class.
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,556
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadfan Do you have any reason to think this? | Well, as I mentioned earlier, I don't know with any degree of certainty that this is what it happening. In a nutshell, back in the day, GW initially cut wholesalers and web-based distributors out of the commerce loop as part of a "direct to retailer" program promoted as an effort to help brick and mortar stores. This sounds like what the new web distribution policy may be aimed at doing based on familiar language in the WotC press release and the RPGNow blurb.
__________________ Non-Functional .Sig |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:34 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: El Reno, Okla
Posts: 1,055
| |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:35 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
| |
exists.
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 1,088
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tmatk I bet you're right, but this move will have no effect. In fact, I bet it increases the amount of books that are pirated; harder to feel bad about downloading a book via bittorrent if their is no way to buy it. | Sadly, I don't see how that won't be the case.
Eugh.
__________________ I think one of the saddest things to see is a mosquito sucking on a mummy..... Forget it little friend. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:36 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
| |
Walking the Nine Worlds
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Burke
Posts: 17,100
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Stalker0 Thing is, if you make it harder to get illegal copies of a pdf on the net, more people are likely to legitimately buy them.
Its the old expression, "why buy the cow when I can get the milk for free". Well the flip side works as well, "If I like milk, and can't get the milk for free, maybe I'll buy a cow".
People get illegal pdfs because its free and easy to do. If the easy to do is taken out, then that's more incentive to just cough up some cash and get the pdf legally. | Huh?
This does not make it harder to get illegal copies.
At least for right now this only makes it harder to get legal copies.
For 3e and 4e stuff illegal copies are the only pdfs currently available.
For older edition stuff this cuts the number of sources of legally obtaining pdfs of them by half. |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:39 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
| |
Walking the Nine Worlds
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Burke
Posts: 17,100
| And now Paizo as well. Crap!  |
| |
6th April 2009, 11:40 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,773
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Asmor RPGNow should have required that in any contract before allowing WotC to sell on their store, so either RPGNow was negligent on that requirement or WotC broke a contract. | Its unlikely that WotC "broke a contract."
If Company A licenses something to Company B, and that license has an uncancellable term of lets say 5 years, and two years in A calls up B and says "your license is over, stop now," there's no reason for B to listen.
The most coercive thing I can think of for WotC to have done is to have given an uncancellable contract, but then to come to RPGNow and say, "We know we can't make you cancel that earlier contract, but we have a new, different contract that will be very lucrative for you, and we will only give it to you if you agree to modify and cancel the earlier contract." You know, offer something the other side will hopefully think is better, and require them to give up one agreement to get the other.
I don't have any reason to think that's happened, though. The most likely scenario is an at will agreement terminatable at any time with notice, notice having been given, and RPGNow realizing it can't uphold promises made to customers.
Someone who's bought things from RPGNow needs to check their fine print and see if they disclaimed this sort of occurrence. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Check out our sponsors! |
| | | | | | | |