Joe Goodman wrote a semi-rebuttal article to Orcus' (Clark's) article.
Goodman Games • View topic - My opinion on D&D 4E
Goodman Games • View topic - My opinion on D&D 4E
Maybe. But I"m pretty sure their bottom line is something profitable.Hmm, I'm pretty sure WotC were aiming for something comparable.
Will 4E do as well as 3E?
Maybe. But I"m pretty sure their bottom line is something profitable.
I won't refute Joseph's information or conviction but my own personal question has never been if 4E is doing well but rather if, with a different approach toward the market and 3PPs, it could be doing as well as 3E.
Why? My reading of Goodman's article is that WotC aren't foolish. But that they would be to aim for that.He seems to be confirming that 4e sales in 2009 are nowhere near 3e sales in 2001 and that it's silly even to compare them. Hmm, I'm pretty sure WotC were aiming for something comparable.
D&D is a small part of WotC. For all we know, D&D's main purpose from a business perspective might be to drive sales of the far more profitable D&D minis. I'm not saying that is the case, but it may be.Edit: In fact, his generational analogy indicates that we should be comparing 4e in 2009 to D&D sales 8-9 years after the 1982 peak... or the 1e to 2e transition. *eek* - that's a pretty low benchmark of success for a company like Hasbro.