"Busywork" in RPG's... - Page 4


What's on your mind?

+ Log in or register to post
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 49
  1. #31
    Registered User
    Scout (Lvl 6)

    lukelightning's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Arlington
    Posts
    2,935
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore lukelightning
    Quote Originally Posted by Stalker0
    The fly rules are bloated and difficult to run. Unless you have perfect fly, its a whole lot of numbers and mini work to run the scenario correctly.
    There should be 3 categories.

    Crappy: Has to spend a standard action each round to fly.
    Average: Has to spend a move action each round to fly (movement is part of this action).
    Perfect: As standard rules.

 

  • #32
    Registered User
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    Glyfair's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    6,311
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Glyfair
    My communities:

    One problem from a designers aspect is that, in RPGs, the busywork (by the article's definition) varies from person to person and group to group.

    Look at the original example, character generation. As can be seen here, many consider it a chore. For many it's their favorite part of the game. For some DMs it can be both.

    Another example is buying equipment. Some DMs and players love that part as character interaction and insist on roleplaying it out every time. Some love it at the lowest levels, but skip the details at the highest levels. Some prefer to skip the details all the time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshua Randall
    Encumbrance other than by armor.

    Tracking things like food, water, torches once you are past the very low levels.

    Spell components, if your DM is a hard-ass and makes the PCs actually acquire them (instead of just assuming their availability).
    Here is another example of the two-edged sword. For me, the reality of these things affecting the game is fun. The drudgery of tracking them, isn't usually.

    I can't wait for the day when electronics can be integrated into the game seemlessly. The game will come with an electronic character sheet that tracks some details (like treasure) instantly and quickly, so I don't have to deal with it.
    David A. Blizzard

    "The only constant I am sure of is this accelerating rate of change" - Downside Up by Peter Gabriel

  • #33
    Writing TimeWatch!
    A 1e title so awesome it's not in the book (Lvl 21)

    Piratecat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    26,959
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Piratecat
    My communities:

    Quote Originally Posted by buzz
    Monte Cook outlined a sorta similar way to wing NPCs in a Dungeoncraft article a few months back.

    Thing is, this kind of process isn't what the rules say. It only comes with experience and a little math-fu. The simple fact that you felt it necessary and beneficial to do this says to me, "D&D could be made better by giving DMs a faster way to make NPCs."
    I agree on all counts, Buzz. In my experience, the complexity of high-lvl NPC generation is a problem that makes the game simply less fun for the DM.

    Incidentally, it was that Dungeoncraft article that finally made me jump into "on the fly" NPC generation with both feet, and I haven't regretted it once. It's made game prep a lot more fun for me.
    - Piratecat, EN World Admin. Now writing TimeWatch, an investigative time travel game.

  • #34
    Registered User
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)



    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,916
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore gizmo33
    The Dungeoncraft article uses a "fighter attack bonus is function of level" trick IIRC. Hmmm...where have I seen that before. Oh yea! Character classes! Seriously though, feats have really taken away alot of the advantage of character classes in the design. I always thought that the whole point of having a character class what that it represented an optimal build for that archetype. It would be fine if feats just provided enhanced flexibility, but many of them just pile on bonuses as well.

    A good character class system would accomplish what the Dungeoncraft article was trying to.

    Seems to me to that IRL fighters never really "choose their feats" anyway. Weapons and styles are dictated by what their culture and trainers tell them is an "optimal build". This whole idea that a player just wades around in some stack of rule books and gets to pick what their character does seems to suggest that no one ever is trained or given advice on anything.

    Also, I vote to get rid of int bonuses to skill points by level. That makes it harder to adjust the intelligence score of a 19th level NPC without it having a huge effect on skills, which is very time consuming. And considering the number of skills that aren't really intelligence based, it doesn't really make a lot of sense.

    And while I'm at it, tone down the magic items. They're mostly just gratuitous bonuses. And also...

  • #35
    Registered User
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Ranger REG's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kaunakakai, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    13,518
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Ranger REG
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Morris
    Interesting article today on, of all places, Magic's website..

    http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/daily/rg1

    (Not that their articles aren't always interesting, they just usually aren't relevant to RPG's). The article discusses the concept of 'busywork' and brings up the question - what parts of D&D do you consider the 'busywork'

    I think the biggest one for me is character generation. Anything to speed up this without cutting too many corners in character variety is welcome - indeed this is one of the reasons I don't allow non-core races and classes in my games.

    Thoughts?
    Well, a portion of character creation is considerd "busywork" as defined by the aforementioned linked article. But how much freedom to create a distinct, personalized character (PC or NPC) must be sacrificed for the sake of getting back time-loss?

    I do admit that NPC generation is most time-consuming, unless you develop a habit of recycling dead characters. Still, how useful it is to offer stats for low-, medium-, high-, and epic-level "vanilla" characters of every makes (creature) and models (classes both single and multi)?
    Anyhoo, just some random thoughts...

    My philosophy is "you don't need me to tell you how to play -- I'll just provide some rules and ideas to use and get out of your way."
    --Monte Cook

    Min/Maxing and munchkinism aren't problems with the game; they're problems with the players.
    --The Role-Playing Game Manifesto by Guardians of Order


    DISCLAIMER: I Am Not A Lawyer

  • #36
    Registered User
    The Great Druid (Lvl 17)

    Wik's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Victoria, British Columbia
    Posts
    5,287
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Blog Entries
    30

    ø Ignore Wik
    You know, what is termed "busywork" in one RPG system won't apply to another. Asa case in point, when I ran my d6 Space campaign six months ago, there was very little "busywork" involved - statting up NPCs, creating adventures, and the like often took my only ten minutes, compared to the hour or so it might take me for D&D (I'm of the "wing it" school).

    Of course, the "busywork" of d6 was in an entirely different place - adding up rolls. But that's another story.

    All that being said, I switched *back* to D&D, so I don't think you can say that "busywork = less fun". But I think you *can* say that when the time spent on Busywork is roughly equal to the time of active play, you might have a problem. It's why, for example, we stopped playing Shadowrun - no one could really keep track of the rules (it's tough for us) and we spent so much time referencing the rules.
    Wik: Solving internet arguments since 1983.

  • #37
    Registered User
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    takasi's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Yuba Sutter, CA
    Posts
    1,040
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore takasi
    Quote Originally Posted by Joshua Randall
    I still don't think N/PC generation can be called busywork. It's essential to the game, and therefor not something that could be skipped or dropped in the interest of speed.
    What about pregenerated characters?

    Creating characters and NPCs is 'busywork' as defined in the article as well as the other definition provided.

  • #38
    The busywork in D&D for me comes in 3 forms: magic (spells & items), feats & skills. Each is a nice feature of the game individually. Together, they make it unwieldy. Add in hit points for extra busywork fun and bookkeeping, and I think it's why I prefer Savage Worlds now.

  • #39
    Registered User
    Lama (Lvl 13)

    Agamon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    AB, Canada
    Posts
    8,891
    Reviews
    Read 9 Reviews

    ø Ignore Agamon
    I've always thought busywork meant doing something just to eat up time. So, in that vein, I'd say, NWN2.

    I get the gist of the OP and the article, though (not sure what the correct term is for work that takes too long). I hate making maps. Even with map making programs, not much fun and takes too long considering the PCs don't often see or use them much. I especially dislike dungeons and urban maps. Overland/rural maps are not so bad.
    Last edited by Agamon; Tuesday, 28th November, 2006 at 02:08 AM.

  • #40
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    buzz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    6,791
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I Defended The Walls!

    ø Ignore buzz
    My communities:

    Quote Originally Posted by Glyfair
    One problem from a designers aspect is that, in RPGs, the busywork (by the article's definition) varies from person to person and group to group.
    True, but I have to believe that there's some defining point between taste and functionality. I mean, no matter how much patience one has for detail, FASA Dr. Who just plain sucks. I.e., a difference between detail and needless effort.
    ENWorld Chicago Gameday: Getting people together to game since 2001.

  • + Log in or register to post
    Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Forked: "Math and Grind" or "Why Rechan is Right" (From: "4e One-trick ponies")
      By RyvenCedrylle in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 73
      Last Post: Saturday, 5th October, 2013, 04:38 AM
    2. Combining "d20 Past" with "Urban Arcana" to make "d20 Fantasy"
      By Jack Daniel in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 5
      Last Post: Tuesday, 3rd May, 2005, 07:22 AM
    3. "The learning game" "El juego de aprender" "Lære leken" IC
      By Tor L'Tha in forum Playing the Game
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: Tuesday, 14th December, 2004, 08:26 PM
    4. Replies: 0
      Last Post: Monday, 29th November, 2004, 08:19 PM
    5. "The learning game" "El juego de aprender" "Lære leken"
      By Tor L'Tha in forum General RPG Discussion
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: Monday, 29th November, 2004, 08:01 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •