Proposal: Exclude Eberron Dragonmark feats




+ Log in or register to post
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    ryryguy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,860

    Ignore ryryguy

    Proposal: Exclude Eberron Dragonmark feats

    Ok, just wanted to get this out there for discussion before they are automatically adopted under the new proposal system.

    I don't think it would be a horrible disaster if these feats did come in. However, I personally wouldn't mind seeing them excluded from L4W, for a couple of reasons.

    First, they just feel too Eberron-specific to me in terms of flavor. I don't like the marks without the Houses, and the Prophecy, and the designated races. If someone comes up with some good story and setting bits to slot them into L4W, that would certainly help to alleviate this. And I know a couple of people have been working on just that. But just as a matter of personal taste, I'd just as soon keep them Eberron because I love how they fit there, and I fear an L4W version just would not feel right.

    Second, they tend to be a bit more powerful than lots of other feats. Not earthshatteringly, game breakingly powerful by any means. And I understand that D&D is not a socialist feat paradise where all feats must be exactly equal. But as a group the dragonmarks are definitely on the upper end of things. They may not quite be "must-haves", but some of them seem like they render some standard feats obsolete. Who would take Linguist or Ritual Casting over Mark of Scribing? Who would take Skill Focus (Perception) over Mark of Sentinel? In Eberron, being dragonmarked carries a lot of "story baggage", so it's not such a no-brainer. Again, maybe some great L4W version could do the same, but it seems like a hard task.
    L4W characters: Ingot, Hergunna
    LEB characters: Lady Roswyn d'Sivis, Harressh

 

  • #2
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Defender (Lvl 8)

    covaithe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,971

    Ignore covaithe
    YES. There is certainly no shortage of rules elements available in L4W. I think it's perfectly reasonable to exclude things like dragonmarks, or FR backgrounds, which are setting specific.

    That said, if someone wanted to propose them, or a version of them, as houseruled content with suitable L4W-specific story baggage, I'd certainly be willing to look at it.
    My games

    Check out Living 4th Edition, a community-run 4e D&D living world open to all. Now open for character and adventure submissions!

  • #3
    Registered User COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)

    garyh's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    5,840

    Ignore garyh
    I'm usually Mr. Inclusion!, but I actually find myself thinking pretty similarly to Covaithe. Not quite ready to put that in green yet, though.
    Gary Hoggatt - www.garyh.net
    "Such heroic nonsense..."
    Living 4th Edition - Join EN World's community-created Play-by-Post world! Adventure awaits you in the Transitive Isles!

  • #4
    Registered User
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    Lord Sessadore's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Saskatoon, SK, Canada
    Posts
    2,525

    Ignore Lord Sessadore
    YES
    I'm with Cov and Garyh. If someone wants to propose them with L4W story baggage, that's fine. Until then, I don't think we need them, and I think ryryguy is right about their relative power without the story baggage.
    Current and past PbP: http://www.enworld.org/forum/4853360-post58.html

  • #5
    It also doesn't appear that anyone has issues with this (since nobody but the judges has posted here)


    LEB Judge - Come try PbP in Eberron (4e)
    http://www.enworld.org/forum/living-eberron/


    L4W Judge - Come try PbP in the Transitive Isles (4e - Homebrew)
    http://www.enworld.org/forum/living-4th-edition/

  • #6
    Registered User
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)



    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Orange, CA
    Posts
    1,537

    Ignore Kalidrev
    I like my dragonmarks to come with a large side of Eberron. They're not really meant for anything else in the same way that spell-fire isn't meant for anything outside of 2.0-3.5 Forgotten Realms. I think it would be too much work and you'd really have to push the envelope to make them work right in L4W and I'm not sure I really want that. If I could propose a big green YES, I would. But I can't, so I won't, lol. Ah what the heck... YES. (not that it means anything...)

  • #7
    I am working on the story about the dragonmarks in L4W but it will take some time

    Oz79

  • + Log in or register to post

    Similar Threads

    1. Dragonmark Feats & Ritual Casting
      By Mustrum_Ridcully in forum D&D and Pathfinder
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: Wednesday, 16th September, 2009, 02:16 PM
    2. OMG Dragonmark feats!
      By chaotix42 in forum D&D and Pathfinder
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: Thursday, 18th June, 2009, 09:09 AM
    3. Eberron: The all Abberant Dragonmark Campaign
      By Crothian in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming Discussion
      Replies: 16
      Last Post: Wednesday, 11th April, 2007, 10:34 PM
    4. [Eberron] Why do none of the setting-specific races have a dragonmark?
      By Dave Turner in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming Discussion
      Replies: 26
      Last Post: Thursday, 14th July, 2005, 07:06 PM
    5. Replies: 8
      Last Post: Friday, 19th November, 2004, 05:12 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •