Proposal: Allow gnoll claws to grant brawler style bonus.




What's on your mind?

+ Log in or register to post
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Scout (Lvl 6)

    Sanzuo's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    614

    Ignore Sanzuo

    Proposal: Allow gnoll claws to grant brawler style bonus.

    The feat, claw fighter, allows gnoll characters to use their natural claws as weapons. As of the release of Martial Power 2 however, the gnoll claws are not included in the list of weapons that allow brawler fighters to benefit from the brawler style bonuses. I propose that that the claw fighter claws (hereinafter referred to as; the claws) be amended to count as having a hand free for the purposes of the brawler style bonuses.

    As of 3/17/10, the claw fighter feat says the following:
    Quote Originally Posted by D&D Compendium
    Benefit: When you make a weapon attack, you can use your claw, which is a weapon in the light blade weapon group. This weapon has the off-hand weapon property and a +3 proficiency bonus, and it deals 1d6 damage. While you aren’t holding anything, you are considered have this weapon in each hand. You can enchant and disenchant your claws. When you disenchant your claws, they do not turn to dust.
    As of 3/17/10, the Brawler style says the following:
    Quote Originally Posted by D&D Compendium
    While you wield a weapon in your primary hand and your off hand is free (see the sidebar), you gain a +1 bonus to AC and a +2 bonus to Fortitude.

    In addition, you gain a +2 proficiency bonus with unarmed attacks and a +2 bonus to grab attacks and attacks to move a creature grabbed by you. These bonuses increase to +4 at 11th level and +6 at 21st level.

    When attacking with a spiked gauntlet, you do not gain the Brawler Style proficiency bonus with unarmed attacks, even if the Brawler Style proficiency bonus is higher than the proficiency bonus of the spiked gauntlet. However, you retain the bonus to grab attacks and to attacks to move a creature grabbed by you.
    The proposed change would essentially allow the claws to function like spiked gauntlets in the above fighter style. The claws would allow the character to gain the +1 bonus to AC and the +2 bonus to Fortitude. The character would gain the +2 bonus to grab attacks and attacks to move a creature that is grabbed, but NOT be granted the +2 proficiency bonus to grab with unarmed attacks since the claws already include a proficiency bonus. The claws would also benefit from certain feats like Brawler Guard which grants a shield bonus to certain defenses and Brutal Brawler which upgrades the damage dice.

    I would like this change to be made for the following reasons:
    1. The claws share characteristics with the spiked gauntlet, including the damage and off-hand property. The claws have a +3 proficiency bonus and deal 1d6 damage. Spiked gauntlets have a +2 proficiency bonus and also deal 1d6 damage.
    2. Although the claw has an additional +1 proficiency bonus over the spiked gauntled, a character also must acquire the Claw Fighter feat to even use the weapon. This is akin to acquiring a superior weapon feat, so therefore the claw is similar to a superior weapon and all that it entails.
    3. The rules as written do not explicitly state the claws do not count as having a hand free, and the claws were likely created before the rules in the Martial Power 2 were finalized. It is probable they were not taken into consideration.
    4. Flavor-wise, I believe the claw makes sense for the brawler to count as having hands free, since the fighter is literally fighting bare-handed.
    5. Lastly, I believe that the claw fighter is very much in the spirit of the brawler fighter. A gnoll slashing, gripping and rending with his or her own bare claws captures in my imagination the flavor of the brawler.


    I will conclude by saying that I believe the changes I have proposed would not adversely affect game balance both because of the extra feat that this character requires and because the claws would not be overpowered compared to other weapons.
    Poop

 

  • #2
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Defender (Lvl 8)

    covaithe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,971

    Ignore covaithe
    My communities:

    Looks okay to me. YES.
    My games

    Check out Living 4th Edition, a community-run 4e D&D living world open to all. Now open for character and adventure submissions!

  • #3
    PbP Addict
    The Great Druid (Lvl 17)

    renau1g's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    16,816

    Ignore renau1g
    My communities:

    As per my e-mail to you also, I'm fine with it, I think it's just something they overlooked and the concept isn't OP'd

    YES also.

  • #4
    Registered User
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)



    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Orange, CA
    Posts
    1,537

    Ignore Kalidrev
    My communities:

    I think this is fine as well. YES.

  • #5
    Registered User
    Scout (Lvl 6)

    Ozymandias79's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    999

    Ignore Ozymandias79
    My communities:

    yes

  • #6
    Member SILVER SUBSCRIBER
    Scout (Lvl 6)

    DarwinofMind's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ponca City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,312
    I Defended The Walls!

    Ignore DarwinofMind
    My communities:

    Not a judge so I can't vote, and I agree that it looks like a good change, just wanted to chime in here with this,

    I don't beleive they overlooked it on the Brawler listing I think it doesn't belong there.

    This change needs to be listed on the Claw Fighter feat but that wasn't possible, as Claw fighter came earlier. I hope when they decide to errata it they don't put reference to claw fighter on the brawler style, instead put reference to brawler in the claw fighter feat it's better organization.

  • #7
    Registered User COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)

    garyh's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    5,840

    Ignore garyh
    My communities:

    Yes from me on this as well. I have no problems with this, I agree it's more a snag based on claw fighter coming before brawler style.
    Gary Hoggatt - www.garyh.net
    "Such heroic nonsense..."
    Living 4th Edition - Join EN World's community-created Play-by-Post world! Adventure awaits you in the Transitive Isles!

  • + Log in or register to post

    Similar Threads

    1. Powers and abilities that grant a bonus after a Roll
      By mattcolville in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 10
      Last Post: Sunday, 30th March, 2014, 12:55 AM
    2. Brawler Style "Empty Hand" Definition
      By Kosh in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 13
      Last Post: Sunday, 14th March, 2010, 07:44 AM
    3. Brawler Style, free hands, and having a target grabbed
      By Radiating Gnome in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 21
      Last Post: Sunday, 14th March, 2010, 05:25 AM
    4. Spells & Feats that grant an AC bonus?
      By aboyd in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 10
      Last Post: Saturday, 2nd August, 2008, 07:36 AM
    5. Does stat-enhancing items grant bonus spells per day?
      By Li Shenron in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 11
      Last Post: Wednesday, 9th June, 2004, 12:49 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •