What's on your mind?
+ Log in or register to post
Results 31 to 40 of 142
Monday, 19th December, 2011, 06:03 PM #1
Hydra (Lvl 25)
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Read 20 Reviews
- Blog Entries
ø Ignore Morrus
Fortress America: When Gaming and Politics Collide
This news item is more related to board games than it is to RPGs, but it raises a general gaming point worth discussing. What happens when gaming and politics collide?
Fantasy Flight Games is creating a new edition of Fortress America, a game originally published in 1986 which pits America against three other nations. It was originally slated to have the following blurb text:
"It is the early 21st century. Having suffered a series of devastating terrorist attacks, the U.S. wields a newly developed and horrifyingly destructive weapon technology with desperate fury, lashing out mercilessly at any government suspected of harboring its hidden enemies. Entire nations are erased from the map. The world is stunned by the brutal display. Facing few options, an unlikely coalition of nations joins forces to attempt one final plan: the invasion of America."
It appears that many of the company's fans found that text to be inflammatory, and FFG apologised:
Our initial announcement of Fortress America included flavor text that was interpreted by readers (quite justifiably) as politically inflammatory. That text has been since altered to correctly reflect our game's backstory. Our marketing department misread certain key thematic elements of the game, and took unauthorized dramatic liberties with the text. We apologize for any offense this may have caused.
And the new blurb text was released; it reads as follows:
In the 21st century, the United States unveiled a military defense system that completely changed global politics. Through a series of satellites and powerful lasers, the U.S. gained a flawless defense against intercontinental missile attacks. The rest of the world feared that this defensive network might be used to launch an attack, and they united to demand that the U.S. dismantle it. A lengthy diplomatic stalemate gripped the globe. With the world at a crossroads, coalitions of nations were formed unlike any that had ever existed before. A plan was devised to destroy this perceived technological threat through military action. It involved attacking from three directions at once, for the nations of the world knew that every army dreads fighting a war on two fronts... and America was about to face three.
Thanks to Tabloid Believer over at Circvs Maximvs.
IMPORTANT NOTE: EN World usually has a rule against discussion of religion or politics. We're going to see - in this one thread only - if we can relax the rule a little in specifically indicated news threads. We'll be keeping a close eye on this thread. You may discuss politics politely (still no religion) BUT you MAY NOT insult another member or nation. Be nice, and we might just do something like this again. Try to discuss it in terms of political concepts and how they relate to gaming, NOT what you think of any specific country.
By Theo R Cwithin in forum General Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 34Last Post: Thursday, 5th August, 2010, 01:05 AM
By Crothian in forum Miscellaneous Geek Talk & Media LoungeReplies: 17Last Post: Tuesday, 30th December, 2008, 05:38 AM
By HellHound in forum General Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 94Last Post: Monday, 22nd May, 2006, 06:53 PM
By Darrin Drader in forum General Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 368Last Post: Thursday, 9th June, 2005, 04:54 PM