5E Which of these settings do you want to see for D&D Next? - Page 4

View Poll Results: Which of these settings should be supported by 5E?

288. This poll is closed
  • A brand new setting

    134 46.53%
  • Birthright

    58 20.14%
  • Dark Sun

    136 47.22%
  • Dragonlance

    69 23.96%
  • Eberron

    110 38.19%
  • Forgotten Realms

    122 42.36%
  • Jakandor

    12 4.17%
  • Ghostwalk

    24 8.33%
  • Greyhawk

    155 53.82%
  • Mystara

    78 27.08%
  • Nerath (Nentir Vale)

    59 20.49%
  • Pelinore

    10 3.47%
  • Planescape

    128 44.44%
  • Ravenloft

    97 33.68%
  • Spelljammer

    68 23.61%
  • Other

    34 11.81%
  • None of the Above

    5 1.74%
Multiple Choice Poll.
+ Log in or register to post
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 51
  1. #31
    Magsman (Lvl 14)

    Knightfall's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Knightfall

    Quote Originally Posted by Elf Witch View Post
    I like the idea of support for older settings. Some of those settings have been out of print for such a long time that for a lot of new players they would be something new.
    This is why I'd really like to see Mystara make a comeback. It hasn't been supported since near the end of the 2e era, and while I really like those products, the line was cancelled so fast that the Known World never got any major support. Add to that the Savage Coast and Hollow World and you have a unique setting with unique races and monsters.

    One could argue that Birthright might be ripe for an update, as well. Yes, they could simply pull the dominion mechanics out of the setting and apply it to the base game, but that wouldn't bring the die hard Birthright fans back into the fold. (I'm not one of them, BTW.) Birthright should not go through another edition without some real support.

    Both Al-Qadim and Kara-Tur are natural expansions to the Realms, which, I feel, is going to be a big deal from the launch of D&D Next onward. I don't think the Realms will be only getting three books this time around. Maztica would be in this category as well, but if WotC keeps the current timeline then Maztica fades into oblivion.

    If WotC created a new setting that combined the best parts of Planescape and Spelljammer, I wouldn't complain. Purists might want the original settings, but I don't think that's going to happen. (I'd buy them.)

    I think the best setting for WotC to get behind, besides the big three*, is Ravenloft. The mainstream market is vampire and werewolf crazy right now. And as long as the designers stay true to the origins of the setting, it could become as popular as the Forgotten Realms (including board games, novels, and CRPGs).

    Imagine a Ravenloft MMO. A grim horror game with the classic concepts of golems, vampires, werewolves, etc. A video game that is more about fear than power-gaming.

    *Forgotten Realms, Dragonlance, and Greyhawk. (Personally, I also put Dark Sun into this category.)

  2. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by cperkins View Post
    That's a tough question. If D&D is looking back to its roots, Greyhawk is a must for me. After that, I think a new setting that incorporates elements of past worlds would be a great way to pull fans together.
    Isn't Nerath (Nentir Vale) already a sort of distillation of various D&D worlds?

    Even though I'm a "Mystara-man" myself, I'd be okay with Oerth or Nerath being the default 5e setting, as long as there was overt mention of Gateways to all the other D&D Worlds.

    This would be paired with a WotC webpage devoted to each World, with all products and novels ever published neatly displayed for download. Some PDFs would be for more than one World--for example, The Keep on the Borderland in Greyhawk, Mystara, and Nerath.

  3. #33
    Brand New Setting, Dark Sun, Eberron. I like Dark Sun and Eberron, and I'd like to see something new, with no previous edition baggage.

  4. #34
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    epochrpg's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block epochrpg

    Mystara; but I would want Hollow World and Savage Coast included in the setting book. If that stuff will fit in Poor Wizard's Almanac, it will fit in the setting book for the planet.

    While I'd prefer they keep "the Immortals" I'd accept it if they started calling them "Gods".

    I think this may be likely, though, because they are making the Caves of Chaos as the first playtest module; and that is set in Mystara (Karameikos specifically).

  5. #35
    Grandfather of Assassins (Lvl 19)

    Mercurius's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    The center and periphery
    Read 3 Reviews

    Block Mercurius

    All and none of the above (or should I say most and none). I'd like to see WotC lightly support every major and one or two minor settings in some form or fashion, especially considering 5E is supposedly meant to support play styles from every edition and era, but focus on a new setting that they develop and flesh out with ongoing support.

  6. #36
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block BronzeDragon

    Good to see Birthright in the poll.

    It was simply the most flavorful setting ever done for any RPG. My recommendations would be (for the new edition) Birthright, Planescape and Greyhawk.

    Edit: had a brain fart....apparently I'm one of the only people that liked BR....oh well...
    Last edited by BronzeDragon; Thursday, 26th January, 2012 at 01:49 AM.

  7. #37
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Ampolitor's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Now Lincolnton, NC
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Ampolitor



    Wow I loved BR, the best setting,you didn't have to be a lord and could
    Just use the world which is what we did. What a fantastic setting.

  8. #38
    New setting, Greyhawk, Spelljammer. One way or another I don't care what they do with the rest. Doesn't mean I don't like them necessarily - just that I don't care what they think they want to do with them going forward.

  9. #39
    I went for the "A new setting" option.

    Time and again we've seen WotC update a setting to use the latest edition, and seen fans complain and whine that they've ruined it forever.

    Even today you can see posts on various message boards from people saying they didn't move to Edition X because they didn't like the changes that WotC did to their favourite setting when changing it to suite that edition.

    So I say they should leave the existing settings alone and create a new setting.

    Existing players and GMs aren't idiots. If they want to use the new rules in their old setting they can sort out whatever combination of setting changes and house rules suits their group best and it can be different for each group.

    That way everyone is happy. Lovers of existing settings don't feel their settings have been "ruined". Those who want to use an older setting with the latest rules can do so in exactly the manner they want. And those who want a new setting designed to accompany the new rules get one.

  10. #40
    Minor Trickster (Lvl 4)

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Mesa, AZ
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block darkwing

    Marvel Universe. It will show whether or not the game is adaptable across genres.

+ Log in or register to post
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for dinosaur settings and jungle settings
    By Twizz Stonefist in forum Roleplaying Games General Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Tuesday, 19th March, 2013, 07:03 AM
  2. Good Obscure Settings? (and some ruminations on classic vs. newer fantasy settings)
    By Mercurius in forum Roleplaying Games General Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Sunday, 24th July, 2011, 04:51 AM
  3. Apocalyptic Settings and Breaking Settings
    By The Grumpy Celt in forum Roleplaying Games General Discussion
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: Wednesday, 3rd September, 2008, 02:46 AM
  4. POL Settings in Literature to Base 4e Settings On
    By wherwrthal in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: Monday, 24th March, 2008, 05:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts