Confidence in WotC - Page 5




What's on your mind?

View Poll Results: What is your confidence level in WotC's ability to successfully manage the D&D brand?

Voters
211. You may not vote on this poll
  • Not confident

    114 54.03%
  • Fairly confident

    55 26.07%
  • Mostly confident

    31 14.69%
  • Absolutely confident

    11 5.21%
+ Log in or register to post
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 52
  1. #41
    Registered User
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)

    Dice4Hire's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nagoya, Japan
    Posts
    5,130
    I Defended The Walls!

    Ignore Dice4Hire
    WOTC? I have a lot of confidence in WOTC and D&D.

    Hasbro and D&D, pretty much zilch.

 

  • #42
    Registered User
    Enchanter (Lvl 12)

    Orius's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    4,404

    Ignore Orius
    My communities:

    I say no confidence. The release of 5e this soon only a few years after 4e and how bumpy things were with 4e do not leave me with a lot of confidence. It's possible I'm being too pessimistic though, and I haven't been really following the brand much lately.
    PbP info here: http://www.enworld.org/forum/5396456-post81.html

  • #43
    Registered User
    Guide (Lvl 11)

    Ulrick's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,128

    Ignore Ulrick
    My communities:

    I think it is time for another company to handle the D&D brand.

    Then again, a number of 3pp are already sort of doing that, such as Paizo and the companies out there producing retroclones. I know WotC is trying to make amends with re-releasing AD&D and 3.5e, and having open playtests for 5e. But I just don't care anymore. There's better products out there now, alternatives that are inline with my gaming philosophy.
    "Farewell, Friend. I was a thousand times more evil than thou!"--Stormbringer

  • #44
    Registered User
    Grandfather of Assassins (Lvl 19)

    delericho's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Falkirk
    Posts
    8,058
    I Defended The Walls!

    Ignore delericho
    My communities:

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallifer View Post
    Wizards of the Coast no more exclusively defines Dungeons & Dragons than did TSR. If as you say it will live on in Pathfinder and the retro-clones, then it will live on, full stop, no difference from living on under WotC. Most of the retro-clones are especially slavish in their continuation of the classic rules. (I hope the same will happen for the Fourth Edition.)
    I agree. But then, I did say "by that name".

  • #45
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueBlackRed View Post
    I've watched D&D get worse and worse from the moment Hasbro bought WotC.
    No confidence at all.
    So since 1999? A year before 3E came out?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dice4Hire View Post
    WOTC? I have a lot of confidence in WOTC and D&D.

    Hasbro and D&D, pretty much zilch.

    I see this a lot (most recently on my FLGS facebook page) where gamers seem to think there are 20 guys in suits from Hasbro breathing down the necks of every D&D developer. Hasbro has little to do with the success/failure of D&D.
    Last edited by Holy Bovine; Thursday, 12th July, 2012 at 05:34 PM.
    "Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel." - Samuel Johnson 18th century English author.

    "Everything must be at once for six month old puppies, 6 year old children and gamers of any age"

  • #46
    Mod Squad
    Orcus on an Off-Day (Lvl 22)

    Umbran's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    27,501
    Blog Entries
    6

    Ignore Umbran
    Quote Originally Posted by Ulrick View Post
    I think it is time for another company to handle the D&D brand.

    Then again, a number of 3pp are already sort of doing that, such as Paizo and the companies out there producing retroclones.
    Well, then you're using the term "brand" in a bit of an odd way.

    Paizo is doing things with the 3e rules. They aren't doing anything with the D&D brand. They can't. They don't own the D&D brand. The "brand" is the name, and by extension the things under the name. If you are doing something with the brand, you are doing something with the identity of D&D, not just the previously published rules.

  • #47
    Registered User
    Lama (Lvl 13)

    Pour's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    931
    Blog Entries
    9

    Ignore Pour
    I surprised myself and decided on a vote of no confidence. I was going to put fairly, and make some post about the barrenness of 4e's twilight and the uncertainty of 5e, but I've had doubts since Essentials, which have grown over the mismanagement of the digital tools, the diminishing Dungeon and Dragon, and the changes in product and content direction, objectives, and audiences to the point I've chosen to stick with my tweaked 4e as a community supporter and investigate 13th Age as my living alternative.

    I was a pretty big advocate of Mike Mearls for a long time, and while I understand his position as a businessman and lover of all D&D, I just find myself looking back at the decisions made under his watch and wishing they'd been different. A lot different. I don't feel compelled to stick around out of any kind of loyalty in part because of them. D&D is kind of an experience for me that encapsulates playing fantasy rpgs in general. I'll always be playing 'D&D' in the non-trademarked way, and the rich history is there for me whenever I need it. I don't need to stay with WotC or force myself to love Pathfinder in order to play it. 5e will do fine without its non-targeted audience, anyway.

    Loving Magic right now, though, so WotC has half my support.

  • #48
    In terms of brand management, not particularly confident. I haven't got to this poll in time to vote, alas.

    In terms of game design, my feeling is that they'll nail it with 5th Ed, and will screw it with the deployment.

    They are indeed cranking up communication with the fan base to make sure they bring something as many people as possible will like. And I think they'll achieve a great percentage of that goal.

    Considering their history of not supporting players with tons of printed adventures and producing mostly fluff in print, I don't have any reason to believe they'll change that. Actually, let me rephrase that. I think they'll change for a bit until someone from high up in HASBRO says "we have to produce more fluff because it sells more units" and then we'll be back to square 1.

    In terms of production I think they'll go for good production values and average art direction (like 4th Ed.) and will barely tackle the racism/sexism in their artwork.

    I agree with what's been said that concentrating on the products the understand and getting rid of some electronic media is a good move. I am sorry for the people who no longer work on those projects, and I am sorry they didn't work out because they looked fun, but I think it's the right decision in the long run.

    In terms of advertising (part of brand management) they will do what they are still doing. Sweet F.A. If anything, they will do a liiiiitle bit to start with. It'll work and then they'll be told "right, you have your players back now. You don't need so much marketing any-more" and that'll be the end of it. Oh, and I'm not expecting to see anything marketing wise outside the USA and, maybe, Canada. We'll see.

    So I have great deal of confidence in them coming up with a great game that will be poorly managed.
    You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. But you ruin the honey.

  • #49
    Registered User
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)



    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    White Hall, Arkansas
    Posts
    337

    Ignore Lokiare
    Every time I think WotC is beginning to change, I soon come to the realization that they are just using PR to try to get lapsed customers back, all the while the reasons they lost customers sails right over their heads.

    Due to recent customer service problems I've stopped posting on their forums. If anyone asks me about 5E I'm going to say the following.

    "Its a 1e/2e retro-clone that isn't done very well, mainly they are banking on the D&D brand name and hoping to make a quick profit before slapping together 6E and selling it the same way in 4-5 years. There are basically no redeeming qualities, what little progress they made, is lost to their questionable business practices."

  • #50
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Myrmidon (Lvl 10)

    Jester Canuck's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    2,085
    Blog Entries
    2
    RavenloftGygax Memorial FundI Defended The Walls!

    Ignore Jester Canuck
    I have a lot of respect and trust in the people making the game. The designers and developers are great. The art director is mostly solid. The community team is trying their best.
    The marketing team... not so much. The legal team continues its overreactions. And the digital team... do they even exist any more? The last couple tools seem to have been made by someone else.

    The management worries me. The CEO doesn't seem to have any love for the game and seems to be really pushing the rest of the employees into silence and focusing them on worn talking points and bland hype.

    The company seems to have a bad case of ADHD, likely due to the continual staff changes. Projects are started, seem halfway through, and then abandoned. As they're continually hyping the next new thing, there's very little follow-through or back support; promised supporting content is seldom released as a result.
    They've made some pretty silly mistakes as a result.

    The biggest I can think of was the miniature line. They cancelled the fully randomized figures for non-random PC figures and semi-visible monsters but used molds and minis from a cancelled miniature set. So they had monsters you didn't need multiples of as the visible minis while the PC figures were frequently non-archetypal and had some pretty terrible repaints.

    4e went from hardbound books, to Essentials, to boxed sets then useless boxed sets with thin cardboard, to cardboard covers.
    They went from separating DM and PC content for the planes and campaign settings to releasing fewer books and mixing the two.

    So I worry.
    5e is built on modules. So they need to publish books with these optional rules. But, with their mindset, it would be really easy to publish half of the must-have really cool modules and then move on to something else and accessories rather than continue with the other half of the must-have really cool modules.
    My gaming Webcomic 5 Minute Workday at www.5mwd.com

  • + Log in or register to post
    Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Replies: 21
      Last Post: Friday, 26th June, 2009, 04:01 AM
    2. Confidence Index: A D&Di poll on VTT and Char Visualizer
      By Aberzanzorax in forum General RPG Discussion
      Replies: 19
      Last Post: Thursday, 28th May, 2009, 07:38 AM
    3. victor's confidence and diseases
      By vhailor in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: Friday, 13th March, 2009, 12:57 PM
    4. Does Victor's Confidence Stack?
      By Stalker0 in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: Saturday, 10th January, 2009, 07:29 PM
    5. Replies: 479
      Last Post: Friday, 27th April, 2007, 05:09 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •