Sunday, 5th August, 2012, 08:56 PM #1
Minor Trickster (Lvl 4)
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
ø Ignore shadow
How much should 5e aim at balance?
I've heard a lot of talk on these boards about ways to "balance" 5e. Having thought about it, I'm beginning to wonder what is meant by the word "balance". Some people seem to think that balance means that every class should have exactly the same damage output in combat (e.g. If a wizard of a certain level can do a 10d6 fireball, then a fighter must also be able to do a 10d6 martial attack). Others seem to suggest that balance means ever class should be completely equal in all situations (not just combat). No matter what happens it seems that there are always complaints about balance (witness the countless revisions and errata regardless of edition).
I'm beginning to think that a perfectly balanced game is an untenable holy grail. Rather than try to aim at absolute balance, I think that 5e should just try to make an exciting game that captures the feel of D&D without worrying if certain options are slightly overpowered or underpowered. Please don't get me wrong, I don't want to see options that vastly inferior to the rest or extremely overpowered spells or feats. I'm simply saying that I'm more concerned that the game captures the fun and feel D&D than I am with precise mathematical balance in every single area of the game.
Your thoughts?When you are in the midst of night look toward the stars.
By KarinsDad in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 1Last Post: Sunday, 15th January, 2012, 10:39 AM
By Edena_of_Neith in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 39Last Post: Tuesday, 1st July, 2008, 11:15 PM
By kobold in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 2Last Post: Wednesday, 14th June, 2006, 07:18 PM
By Cannonfodder in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 0Last Post: Saturday, 20th August, 2005, 01:21 PM
By CerberusAOD in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 5Last Post: Friday, 23rd August, 2002, 02:14 PM