ComradeGnull
First Post
Of course, we don't need 5 different Ropers, each with a rich backstory/history.
Hey, don't knock it. They finally got their own spin-off.
'Takes double damage from John Ritters' just doesn't have the impact it used to.
Of course, we don't need 5 different Ropers, each with a rich backstory/history.
I don't really care either way. Just use the same approach they used to turn Lycanthropes into a playable race, a.k.a. the Shifters.I tend to prefer Minotaurs as a people and I'm not all that big on Dragonlance, and don't play WOW at all.
Imho, just like pantheons or magic-systems, monsters and races should be setting-specific if you want them to be 'done right'.
A 'generic' minotaur doesn't make sense.
You more-or-less said it already: there should be a minotaur for every setting that needs one.So you would have a minotaur for every campaign setting?
And they don't need to be in every campaign setting. *looks at 4th Ed Dark Sun*