+ Log in or register to post
Results 1 to 10 of 36
Thread: More maneuvers at low level.
Monday, 5th November, 2012, 04:25 PM #1
Guide (Lvl 11)
More maneuvers at low level.
One thing I don’t like about the maneuvers is that the lower level rogues and fighters don’t know enough of them. Instead of getting maneuvers as you level up what about getting all of your style’s maneuvers right away at 1st level. You will still be getting more and better dice as you level, but I would like to see low-level rogues and fighters have more to spend their dice on. This option would make the fighter and rogue more interesting at lower levels.
Also instead of an extra attack at 6th level how about picking a second style and getting all five of its maneuvers at 6th? So as a fighter you would have 6 maneuvers at 1st and 11 at 6th,
Another alternative would be to get a new maneuver every level.
Last edited by fjw70; Monday, 5th November, 2012 at 04:31 PM.
Monday, 5th November, 2012, 08:34 PM #2
Greater Elemental (Lvl 23)
This would require all maneuvers to be about the same level in lamenes-- er... I mean, power. You can't make any one maneuver more powerful than another. We already have the issue where the GM can just let players make up their own Style or Scheme and thus take the higher-level maneuvers whenever they want... this would only compound the problem.
On top of that... class frontloading was one of the biggest issues with multiclassing, and this would be another place where your suggestion would really screw things up. Take 1 level of Fighter and get 5 maneuvers out of it.
Lots of pain for little gain methinks.
Monday, 5th November, 2012, 08:53 PM #3
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
No, this would be too confusing for new players.
Monday, 5th November, 2012, 09:18 PM #4
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
Not only confusing, it would dramatically dilute the reward for leveling up. Maneuvers are roughly equivalent to a caster's spells. The main reward of leveling up is to be able to do new things. If you take this away, you better come up with some great new stuff to give characters that level up.
Monday, 5th November, 2012, 09:29 PM #5
Gallant (Lvl 3)
I would like to see both fighters and rogues get more maneuvers, but as they level up not right out of the gate.
Monday, 5th November, 2012, 09:38 PM #6
Guide (Lvl 11)
The new player problem is easy to solve. Donít use fighting styles. Just give them deadly strike and slowly introduce maneuvers as you think they are ready.
As to multi-classing, they are already working on the front loading issue. I would rather find a new way to multi-class than to only start with 2 maneuvers.
To address the level-up issue I wouldnít be opposed to starting with a full styleís worth of maneuvers and getting a new one every even level. It is still only 11 maneuvers at 10th level.
I love the expertise dice. I just donít think you have to play for months and months just to have a bunch of cool things to use them on.
If most people donít play past level 10 then letís make the most of levels 1-10.
As far as complexity the rules could have three options.
A) Low complexity fighter = Deadly Strike only
B) Medium complexity fighter = Deadly Strike plus one other at 1st level, and new maneuvers at 2, 4, 8, 10.
C) High complexity fighter = Deadly Strike plus a full fighting style at 1st, and new maneuvers at 2, 4, 8, 10.
Yes, I like those options.
By B.T. in forum D&D 5th Edition News, Rules, Homebrews, and House RulesReplies: 13Last Post: Thursday, 9th August, 2012, 05:50 PM
By Grunker in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR GamingReplies: 8Last Post: Monday, 25th June, 2012, 04:33 AM
By axenome in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR GamingReplies: 5Last Post: Monday, 12th October, 2009, 08:44 PM
By chryx in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR GamingReplies: 1Last Post: Sunday, 6th May, 2007, 01:46 PM
By Egres in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR GamingReplies: 26Last Post: Friday, 6th April, 2007, 11:59 PM