WayneLigon
Adventurer
why all the apparent hate?
Several reasons:
They don't feel like Batman films, they feel like mundane crime drama films with a character that sorta resembles Batman who appears in less than half the film. The first half of the first movie was very good, since we've never gotten a film with Bruce's training. Also, kudos for using R'as al Ghul.
The emphasis on 'realism' set up expectations and tone for other DC films - DC characters don't do 'realism' very well at all. The vast majority of them are very much larger than life. As a good example, the Bane you see there is a pale shadow of the actual character. Characters can be done in a 'realistic style' without sacrificing their integrity. We can see how this played out to terrible, terrible effect in Man of Steel, and the others like likely to be just as bad as long as Nolan is king of the hill at WB.
No Robin. Batman needs a Robin. Batman requires a Robin. First film should have ended with Bruce going to the circus, second film should have had a truncated Robin origin and Two-Face, save the Joker for your crown in the trilogy.
That stupid, stupid 'Batman Voice' that Bale adopts in the second and third films. The Bane voice is even worse.