Anyone have Strongholds and Dynasties or Empires?

johnsemlak

First Post
More specifically, Strongholds and Dynasties by Mongoose, and Empires from AEG by Mike Mearls

I've been waiting works like these for a while so I'm rather interested.

As I understand both introduce d20 rules for running dominions, as well as presenting mass combat systems and a whole lot of other stuff for running Empires/kingdoms in game.

Does anyone have either work and have any comments on either?
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


I've given up waiting for Fields of Blood and have switched my anticipation over to AEG's Empires.

In my opinion the name Mike Mearls on a product is about as close to a "Seal of Approval" as you are going to get (Along with three or four other individual Authors and one Publisher just to keep Mearls' ego in check :)).
 

Me too :p

BTW, you may want to check out d20 Birthright rules. I personaly found them too math-intensive, however. (I'm talking dominion-level here, I never got to really check the mass-battle rules... though I got some units moving).
 

I have Empire, and I have used Birthright. My homebrew world is currently described in terms of the Birthright system.

Birthright:
Good for political conflicts, but does not scale down well. Specifically, it is easy to create a realm/domain that can only survive with a powerful (read as: High Level) character ruling it. There is no systematic representation of the lower-ranked nobles that support the leaders of the true domains (small numbers of manors, for example). The game is predicated on the PCs being rulers of nations; there is no middle ground (unless the DM works to create such).

The mass combat system relies on War Cards and luck plays a bigger factor than strategy; it is a little more abstract than many would like while not being abstract enough for others.

Despite the shortcomings I mentioned, the BR system does an excellent job of integrating the four major types of characters into rulership. It presents a very good way of handling Law (military), Temple (religious), Guild (trade and criminal), Source (magical), and Realm (land ownership) sources of power and influence. Likewise, the Blood Abilities play up well the concept of royal blood being superior.

Empire:
I have also been reading through Empire. I have paid most attention to the rulership system. As I mentioned in another thread here on the same topic, it has good points and bad points.

On the good side, it scales well. The design is predicated on there being three scales: Barony, the smallest, where the rulers wield influence over a small region; Kingdom, the middle, where the rulers wield influence over a larger region (theoretically composed of multiple Baronies); and Empire, the largest, where the ruler(s) are overlord(s) of a union of two or more otherwise-independent Kingdom-sized realms. Rather than let the numbers of things grow huge (and unmanageable), the numbers remain small, but the meanings of the "units" become larger.

As far as managing domains, Empire feels like a mix of the Sid Meier's Civilization and the Warcraft style games. The resources are much the same as in Warcraft (primarily Food, Stone, Lumber, Gold, and Iron), and are harvested by assigning a "population unit" to work a "land unit" (like assigning population to a "city square" in Sid's Civilization). Settlements start small, can be increased in size, and can have upgrades added to them (a la Sid's Civilization). Because these are all abstract units, they scale with the scope of the campaign.

The 11 main classes are each discussed in terms of how they rule, and 4 additional class features that only pertain when ruling a domain are added to each. This gives the classes good integration with the rules presented, and shows how each can be an effective ruler.

The mass combat system has some good points; notably the inclusion of a "size factor" for units, in which one can choose to create units with variable numbers of creatures (most other systems assume a constant number of creatures per unit). Otherwise, the system is much like many other d20 mass combat systems: it treats a unit in terms of the stats of a single creature.

On the downside, it feels like the book was cut down. All power is discussed in terms of land (merged with the military), with no power accorded to religious, magical, or trade -based organizations. While the mining of precious metals is covered, as well as their use in making trade goods (magic items), there is no mention of gems (for example). Some trade in exotic creatures would be plausible, but is not mentioned. Likewise, the city upgrades are a list that begs to be expanded; I can envision a Shipwright's Guild that produces ships to be sold, used to enable trade, or made part of the navy (a Port upgrade is available, but its function only affects the ability to trade).

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:

Silveras said:
Empire:
I have also been reading through Empire. I have paid most attention to the rulership system. As I mentioned in another thread here on the same topic, it has good points and bad points.

On the good side, it scales well. The design is predicated on there being three scales: Barony, the smallest, where the rulers wield influence over a small region; Kingdom, the middle, where the rulers wield influence over a larger region (theoretically composed of multiple Baronies); and Empire, the largest, where the ruler(s) are overlord(s) of a union of two or more otherwise-independent Kingdom-sized realms. Rather than let the numbers of things grow huge (and unmanageable), the numbers remain small, but the meanings of the "units" become larger.

As far as managing domains, Empire feels like a mix of the Sid Meier's Civilization and the Warcraft style games. The resources are much the same as in Warcraft (primarily Food, Stone, Lumber, Gold, and Iron), and are harvested by assigning a "population unit" to work a "land unit" (a la Warcraft). Settlements start small, can be increased in size, and can have upgrades added to them (a la Sid's Civilization). Because these are all abstract units, they scale with the scope of the campaign.

The 11 main classes are each discussed in terms of how they rule, and 4 additional class features that only pertain when ruling a domain are added to each. This gives the classes good integration with the rules presented, and shows how each can be an effective ruler.

The mass combat system has some good points; notably the inclusion of a "size factor" for units, in which one can choose to create units with variable numbers of creatures (most other systems assume a constant number of creatures per unit). Otherwise, the system is much like many other d20 mass combat systems: it treats a unit in terms of the stats of a single creature.

On the downside, it feels like the book was cut down. All power is discussed in terms of land (merged with the military), with no power accorded to religious, magical, or trade -based organizations. While the mining of precious metals is covered, as well as their use in making trade goods (magic items), there is no mention of gems (for example). Some trade in exotic creatures would be plausible, but is not mentioned. Likewise, the city upgrades are a list that begs to be expanded; I can envision a Shipwright's Guild that produces ships to be sold, used to enable trade, or made part of the navy (a Port upgrade is available, but its function only affects the ability to trade).

Hope that helps.
I agree--good, fairly concise summary. I remember thinking that it was a logical, scaled-down P&P version of Civ3...which felt a bit...I dunno...clinical. (Well, certainly mathematical.)
 

Silveras said:
On the downside, it feels like the book was cut down. All power is discussed in terms of land (merged with the military), with no power accorded to religious, magical, or trade -based organizations...

Ooooh....that ain't good :(
 
Last edited:

Teflon Billy said:
Ooooh....that ain't good :(

To clarify, aside from discussing each spellcasting class as a King, the only other mentions are in the city upgrades. Building a Grand Temple helps avert Random Events, and a Wizards' Academy allows you to make magic items as a type of trade goods.

I like Birthright's integration of different functions for different types of rulers, who could co-operate in shared land space. That "giving everyone more options" approach allows for better, more diverse campaigns, IMHO.
 

On the downside, it feels like the book was cut down. All power is discussed in terms of land (merged with the military), with no power accorded to religious, magical, or trade -based organizations. While the mining of precious metals is covered, as well as their use in making trade goods (magic items), there is no mention of gems (for example). Some trade in exotic creatures would be plausible, but is not mentioned. Likewise, the city upgrades are a list that begs to be expanded; I can envision a Shipwright's Guild that produces ships to be sold, used to enable trade, or made part of the navy (a Port upgrade is available, but its function only affects the ability to trade).

Hmm, I wonder if material dealing with religious, magical, or trade -based organizations could easily be added as a sort of web enhancement or other supplement?
 


Remove ads

Top