[OOC] Academy of Drell, Part II
- Thread starter Zhure
- Start date
Zhure
First Post
http://www.gamingreport.com/article.php?sid=4060&mode=thread&order=0
So, you think Drell has potential?
So, you think Drell has potential?
Zhure
First Post
After mulling it over for a day or so, I think Drell is too niched to be accepted. I do plan on submitting something, though. One page for a shot - however remote -- at some serious money is a deal I can't pass up. I like writing campaigns more than running them, so even if nothing comes from it, I'll still enjoy myself.
Greg
Greg
Lichtenhart
First Post
Sorry
I've just noticed I forgot to roll arcane spell failure due to armor in the encounter with the shadow and the prestidigitation in the cave. It won't happen anymore, I swear.
I've just noticed I forgot to roll arcane spell failure due to armor in the encounter with the shadow and the prestidigitation in the cave. It won't happen anymore, I swear.
Jeremy
Explorer
Then Sildarin can finally believably say, "It wasn't my fault."
For now we just have to assume Sildarin is interested in the wiggling posteriors of human girls 113 years younger than him.
And remember, the psicrystal is only a magnification of an aspect of yourself.
In this case, the observant part that notices other aspects of female anatomies.
Apologies to those who feel I'm being crude. I just find it an immensely appropriate reaction for a magnification of a male's selective observation skills. If men who are possessed of integrity and morals can look but keep it to themselves, what precisely is the male aspect of a person's personality going to do if it has only the observant nature and none of the other balancing factors of the personality PLUS its observant nature is magnified?
Well played.
For now we just have to assume Sildarin is interested in the wiggling posteriors of human girls 113 years younger than him.
And remember, the psicrystal is only a magnification of an aspect of yourself.
In this case, the observant part that notices other aspects of female anatomies.Apologies to those who feel I'm being crude. I just find it an immensely appropriate reaction for a magnification of a male's selective observation skills. If men who are possessed of integrity and morals can look but keep it to themselves, what precisely is the male aspect of a person's personality going to do if it has only the observant nature and none of the other balancing factors of the personality PLUS its observant nature is magnified?
Well played.
Similar Threads
